机械心脏瓣膜患者中利伐沙班与华法林的比较:开放性、概念验证试验——RIWA 研究。
Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves: Open-Label, Proof-of-Concept trial-The RIWA study.
机构信息
PPGMS/Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Medical School, Federal University of Bahia, FAMEB/UFBA, Largo do Terreiro de Jesus, XV de Novembro Square, s/n, Salvador, Bahia, CEP 40026-010, Brazil.
出版信息
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 May;21(3):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00449-3. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
To date, vitamin K antagonists are the only available oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves. In this way, we developed a pilot trial with rivaroxaban.
METHODS
The RIWA study was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized clinical trial and was designed to assess the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events of the rivaroxaban-based strategy (15 mg twice daily) in comparison to dose-adjusted warfarin. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and were followed prospectively for 90 days.
RESULTS
A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 44 patients were randomized: 23 patients were allocated to the rivaroxaban group and 21 to the warfarin group. After 90 days of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in one patient (4.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and three patients (14.3%) in the warfarin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-2.85; P = 0.25). Minor bleeding (without discontinuation of medical therapy) occurred in six patients (26.1%) in the rivaroxaban group versus six patients (28.6%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.23-3.32; P = 0.85). One patient in the warfarin group died from myocardial infarction. No cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, peripheral embolic events, or new intracardiac thrombus were related in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In this pilot study, rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily had thromboembolic and bleeding events similar to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. These data confirm the authors' proof-of-concept and suggest that a larger trial with a similar design is not unreasonable. CLINICALTRIAL.
GOV IDENTIFIER
NCT03566303.
背景与目的
迄今为止,机械心脏瓣膜患者唯一可用的口服抗凝剂是维生素 K 拮抗剂。为此,我们开展了一项利伐沙班的初步临床试验。
方法
RIWA 研究是一项概念验证、开放标签、随机临床试验,旨在评估利伐沙班组(每天两次 15 毫克)与剂量调整华法林相比的血栓栓塞和出血事件发生率。患者按 1:1 比例随机分组,并前瞻性随访 90 天。
结果
本研究共纳入 72 例患者。其中 44 例患者被随机分组:23 例患者分配到利伐沙班组,21 例患者分配到华法林组。随访 90 天后,利伐沙班组中有 1 例患者(4.3%)和华法林组中有 3 例患者(14.3%)发生主要结局(风险比 [RR] 0.27;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.02-2.85;P = 0.25)。利伐沙班组中有 6 例患者(26.1%)发生轻微出血(无需停止药物治疗),华法林组中有 6 例患者(28.6%)发生轻微出血(RR 0.88;95%CI 0.23-3.32;P = 0.85)。华法林组中有 1 例患者死于心肌梗死。两组均无出血性卒中、瓣膜血栓形成、外周栓塞事件或新的心内血栓形成。
结论
在这项初步研究中,利伐沙班 15 毫克,每天两次,在机械心脏瓣膜患者中的血栓栓塞和出血事件与华法林相似。这些数据证实了作者的概念验证,并表明类似设计的更大规模试验并非不合理。临床试验。
.gov 标识符:NCT03566303。