Zambiazi Priscilla J, Aparecido Gabriel de O, Ferraz Thiago V de B, Skinner William S J, Yoshimura Rafael G, Moreira Daniel E B, Germscheidt Rafael L, Nascimento Lucas L, Patrocinio Antonio Otavio T, Formiga André L B, Bonacin Juliano A
Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Dalton Trans. 2020 Nov 25;49(45):16488-16497. doi: 10.1039/d0dt02220a.
Cobalt-Prussian blue analogues are remarkable catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (water oxidation) under mild conditions such as neutral pH. Although there are extensive reports in the literature about the application of these catalysts in water oxidation (the limiting step for hydrogen evolution), some limitations must be overcome in terms of improving the turnover frequency, oxygen production, long term stability, and elucidation of the mechanism. Another important feature to consider is the industrial processability of electrolytic cells for water splitting. For these reasons, we have reported herein a comparison of the electrochemical and chemical properties of three catalysts produced from cobalt-Prussian blue. Co-Co PBA 60 refers to cobalt-Prussian blue heated up to 60 °C with a high content of water. Co-Co PBA 200 is the same starting material but heated up to 200 °C with a low water content. Finally, Co3O4 is a thermal decomposition product obtained from heating cobalt-Prussian blue up to 400 °C. Although Co-Co PBA 60 has a higher overpotential for water oxidation than Co-Co PBA 200, this catalyst is kinetically faster than Co PBA 200. It is suggested that the water coordinated to Co2+ in Co-Co PBA 60 can accelerate the reaction and that there is a balance between the thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics for determining the final properties of the catalyst at pH = 7. Another important observation is that the Co3O4 catalyst has the best performance among the considered catalysts with the highest TON and TOF. This suggests that the different mechanisms and surface effects demonstrated by the Co3O4 catalyst are more conducive to efficient water oxidation than those of Prussian blue. Further studies concerning the effect of water and surface on these catalysts under mild conditions are essential to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of water oxidation and to advance the development of new catalysts.
钴普鲁士蓝类似物是在中性pH等温和条件下用于析氧反应(水氧化)的出色催化剂。尽管文献中有大量关于这些催化剂在水氧化(析氢的限速步骤)中应用的报道,但在提高周转频率、产氧量、长期稳定性以及阐明反应机理方面仍需克服一些局限性。另一个需要考虑的重要因素是用于水分解的电解池的工业可加工性。基于这些原因,我们在此报告了由钴普鲁士蓝制备的三种催化剂的电化学和化学性质的比较。Co-Co PBA 60指加热至60°C且含水量高的钴普鲁士蓝。Co-Co PBA 200是相同的起始材料,但加热至200°C且含水量低。最后,Co3O4是将钴普鲁士蓝加热至400°C得到的热分解产物。尽管Co-Co PBA 60在水氧化方面的过电位高于Co-Co PBA 200,但该催化剂在动力学上比Co PBA 200更快。有人认为,Co-Co PBA 60中与Co2+配位的水可以加速反应,并且在pH = 7时,热力学和动力学特性之间存在平衡,决定了催化剂的最终性能。另一个重要的观察结果是,在所考虑的催化剂中,Co3O4催化剂具有最佳性能,其TON和TOF最高。这表明,Co3O4催化剂所表现出的不同机理和表面效应比普鲁士蓝更有利于高效水氧化。在温和条件下进一步研究水和表面对这些催化剂的影响,对于更好地理解水氧化机理和推动新型催化剂的开发至关重要。