Appiani Marta, Rabitti Noemi Sofia, Methven Lisa, Cattaneo Camilla, Laureati Monica
Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, UK.
Foods. 2020 Nov 3;9(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/foods9111594.
Few methodological approaches have been developed to measure lingual tactile sensitivity, and little information exists about the comparison between children and adults. The aims of the study were to: verify the cognitive and perceptive suitability of Von Frey filaments and a gratings orientation test in children of different ages; compare lingual tactile sensitivity between children and adults; investigate the relationships between lingual tactile sensitivity, preference and consumption of foods with different textures and level of food neophobia. One hundred and forty-seven children aged 6-13 years and their parents participated in the study, in addition to a separate sample of seventy adults. Participants filled in questionnaires, and lingual tactile sensitivity was evaluated through filaments and gratings. Results showed that gratings evaluation was more difficult than filaments assessment but enabled a better separation of participants according to their performance than filaments. R-indices from filaments were not correlated with those of gratings, suggesting that the tools measure different dimensions of lingual tactile sensitivity. No differences were found in lingual tactile sensitivity between children and adults, nor between children of different ages. Food neophobia was negatively associated with preferences of hard foods in children. Although a multifactor analysis concluded that neither texture preferences nor food consumption were strongly correlated with lingual tactile sensitivity, there was a weak but significant positive correlation between lingual tactile sensitivity to the finest Von Frey filament and food neophobia in the youngest age group, indicating that children with higher levels of food neophobia are more sensitive to oral tactile stimuli. Suitable child-friendly adaptations for the assessment of lingual sensitivity in children are discussed.
目前用于测量舌触觉敏感性的方法很少,关于儿童与成人之间的比较信息也很少。本研究的目的是:验证不同年龄儿童对冯·弗雷细丝和光栅定向测试的认知和感知适用性;比较儿童与成人之间的舌触觉敏感性;研究舌触觉敏感性、对不同质地食物的偏好和消费以及食物新恐惧症水平之间的关系。除了70名成年人的单独样本外,147名6至13岁的儿童及其父母参与了该研究。参与者填写问卷,并通过细丝和光栅评估舌触觉敏感性。结果表明,光栅评估比细丝评估更困难,但与细丝相比,能根据参与者的表现更好地将他们区分开来。细丝的R指数与光栅的R指数不相关,这表明这些工具测量的是舌触觉敏感性的不同维度。儿童与成人之间以及不同年龄儿童之间的舌触觉敏感性均未发现差异。食物新恐惧症与儿童对硬质食物的偏好呈负相关。尽管多因素分析得出质地偏好和食物消费与舌触觉敏感性均无强相关性,但在最年幼的年龄组中,对最细冯·弗雷细丝的舌触觉敏感性与食物新恐惧症之间存在微弱但显著的正相关,这表明食物新恐惧症水平较高的儿童对口腔触觉刺激更敏感。文中讨论了适用于儿童舌敏感性评估的适合儿童的调整方法。