Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者行切除关节成形术与保留跖趾关节的前足关节成形术后生活质量改善的时间进程

Time Course of Quality of Life Improvement Between Resection Arthroplasty and Metatarsophalangeal Joint-Preserving Forefoot Arthroplasty for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

作者信息

Shimomura Kota, Yasui Tetsuro, Teramoto Atsushi, Ozasa Yasuhiro, Yamashita Toshihiko, Iwasawa Mitsuyasu

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Feb;42(2):166-175. doi: 10.1177/1071100720962096. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resection arthroplasty has long been a major treatment option for forefoot deformity caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint-preserving surgery is now surpassing classic resection arthroplasty. This study was performed to compare the postoperative results of these 2 operative methods.

METHODS

Fifty-one toes of 40 patients with RA who underwent resection arthroplasty (resection group) or MTP joint-preserving arthroplasty (preservation group) from 2014 to 2017 for forefoot deformity were followed up for >1 year and were retrospectively analyzed. In the preservation group, open reduction of joint dislocation was performed if needed, and the deformity was corrected by metatarsal shortening osteotomy. The mean follow-up period was 21 months. The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scales (objective outcome measures), the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) (subjective outcome measure), and radiographic indices were compared between the groups. The resection group and preservation group comprised 15 toes of 11 patients and 36 toes of 29 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the preoperative radiographic indices, JSSF scales, or SAFE-Q results between the 2 groups. The preservation group showed better JSSF scores at the last follow-up (median hallux scale, 89 vs 74; median lesser scale, 87 vs 79). In the preservation group, the SAFE-Q scores gradually improved with time until 12 months postoperatively. In the resection group, the scores decreased 3 months postoperatively and then improved and reached a plateau 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in the SAFE-Q scores between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MTP joint-preserving arthroplasty resulted in superior objective scores to resection arthroplasty in patients with RA forefoot deformity. Although the subjective scores did not differ between the groups at the last follow-up, the time course of postoperative quality of life improvement was different between the 2 surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

背景

长期以来,切除关节成形术一直是类风湿关节炎(RA)所致前足畸形的主要治疗选择。然而,保留跖趾(MTP)关节的手术目前正在超越经典的切除关节成形术。本研究旨在比较这两种手术方法的术后结果。

方法

对2014年至2017年因前足畸形接受切除关节成形术(切除组)或保留MTP关节成形术(保留组)的40例RA患者的51个足趾进行了>1年的随访,并进行回顾性分析。在保留组中,必要时进行关节脱位的切开复位,并通过跖骨缩短截骨术矫正畸形。平均随访期为21个月。比较两组之间的日本足外科学会(JSSF)量表(客观结局指标)、足部自我评估问卷(SAFE-Q)(主观结局指标)和影像学指标。切除组和保留组分别包括11例患者的15个足趾和29例患者的36个足趾。

结果

两组术前影像学指标、JSSF量表或SAFE-Q结果无显著差异。保留组在最后一次随访时JSSF评分更高(拇趾量表中位数,89对74;小趾量表中位数,87对79)。在保留组中,SAFE-Q评分在术后12个月前随时间逐渐改善。在切除组中,评分在术后3个月下降,然后改善,并在术后6个月达到平台期。术后12个月,两组之间的SAFE-Q评分无显著差异。

结论

对于RA前足畸形患者,保留MTP关节成形术的客观评分优于切除关节成形术。虽然两组在最后一次随访时主观评分无差异,但两种手术术后生活质量改善的时间进程不同。

证据水平

III级,回顾性比较研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验