Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw.
Department of Audiology and Phoniatrics, Tinnitus Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw.
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):654-661. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000967.
The Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) is considered the gold standard in measuring tinnitus severity. The aim of the study was to establish reference values to improve the interpretability of TFI scores.
Results from 1114 patients with tinnitus were retrospectively analyzed. The participants were consecutive patients who attended our tertiary referral Ear, Nose, and Throat Center. The eligibility criteria were: at least 18 years old, persistent tinnitus, completed pure-tone audiometry, and answered all 25 items on the TFI. Hearing status (normal hearing vs. hearing impairment) was established according to the recommendation of the Bureau International d'Audiophonologie. Means (M) and SD on the TFI were the basis for grading tinnitus severity on four levels: low, lower moderate, upper moderate, and high. To gauge individual scores in clinical practice, percentiles are also proposed.
All 1114 patients (586 women and 528 men) were Caucasian and aged from 19 to 87 years (M = 50.96; SD = 13.10 years). Tinnitus duration ranged from 0.5 to 50 years (M = 7.17; SD = 7.71 years). There were 258 patients with normal hearing and 856 patients with hearing loss. A score of above 65 points on TFI was established as the cutoff point for diagnosing high tinnitus severity. A regression model associating tinnitus severity with gender, age, tinnitus duration, and hearing loss was statistically significant: F(4,1109) = 8.99; p < 0.001, but the effect was very small (R2adj = 0.028) and only gender and age were associated with TFI global score, while tinnitus severity was not related to tinnitus duration or hearing loss.
The reference values proposed here support those reported previously by Meikle et al. They are empirically based and can be used as benchmarks in clinical practice and scientific research. They make it possible to assess tinnitus severity, evaluate individual scores, and categorize individuals with tinnitus. This allows researchers to set inclusion or exclusion criteria when assigning patients to specific groups during clinical trials involving tinnitus intervention strategies.
耳鸣指数量表(Tinnitus Functional Index,TFI)被认为是衡量耳鸣严重程度的金标准。本研究旨在建立参考值以提高 TFI 评分的可解释性。
对 1114 例耳鸣患者的回顾性分析。参与者为连续就诊于我们的三级转诊耳鼻喉科中心的患者。入选标准为:年龄至少 18 岁,持续性耳鸣,完成纯音测听,回答 TFI 的全部 25 个条目。听力状况(正常听力与听力障碍)根据国际听觉协会的建议确定。TFI 的平均值(M)和标准差(SD)是将耳鸣严重程度分为四级的基础:轻度、轻度中度、中度重度和重度。为了在临床实践中评估个体分数,还提出了百分位数。
所有 1114 例患者(586 例女性和 528 例男性)均为白种人,年龄 1987 岁(M = 50.96;SD = 13.10 岁)。耳鸣持续时间 0.550 年(M = 7.17;SD = 7.71 年)。258 例患者听力正常,856 例患者听力下降。TFI 评分超过 65 分被确定为诊断重度耳鸣的临界值。与性别、年龄、耳鸣持续时间和听力损失相关的耳鸣严重程度的回归模型具有统计学意义:F(4,1109)= 8.99;p < 0.001,但效应非常小(调整 R2= 0.028),仅性别和年龄与 TFI 总分相关,而耳鸣严重程度与耳鸣持续时间或听力损失无关。
这里提出的参考值与 Meikle 等人之前报告的参考值相吻合。它们基于经验,可在临床实践和科学研究中用作基准。它们可以评估耳鸣严重程度、评估个体分数并对耳鸣患者进行分类。这使得研究人员能够在涉及耳鸣干预策略的临床试验中为患者分配到特定组时设定纳入或排除标准。