Department of Physiotherapy, Government District Headquarter Hospital, Nowshera, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa.
Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;70(10):1688-1692. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.15939.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of post-isometric relaxation, myofascial trigger point release and routine physical therapy on pain, disability and cervical range of motion in patients with acute mechanical neck pain. METHODS: The randomised control trial was conducted at the District Headquarter Hospital in Nowshehra, Pakistan, from July to December 2017 and comprised subjects of either gender aged 16-49 years with acute neck pain. They were randomised into three groups; post-isometric relaxation group 1, myofascial trigger point release group 2 and routine physical therapy group 3. Neck disability index, numeric pain rating scale and cervical goniometry were documented before intervention, after the first session and after 6 sessions in two weeks. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, there were 20(33.3%) in each of the three groups. Mean age in group 1 was 32.25±9.56 years, group 2 2.35±9.05 years and in group 3 it was 32.75±7.82 years. Scores for neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale as well as rotation to right and left showed significant difference among the groups post-treatment (p<0.05). Within group analysis showed significant improvements in all parameters post-treatment in all the groups (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute mechanical neck pain treated with post-isometric relaxation technique had more and faster effect in decreasing pain and disability and in improving mobility.
目的:比较等长松弛、肌筋膜触发点释放和常规物理疗法对急性机械性颈痛患者疼痛、残疾和颈椎活动度的影响。
方法:本随机对照试验于 2017 年 7 月至 12 月在巴基斯坦诺雪赫拉区总部医院进行,纳入年龄在 16-49 岁之间的急性颈痛的男女患者。将他们随机分为三组:等长松弛组 1、肌筋膜触发点释放组 2 和常规物理治疗组 3。在干预前、第一次治疗后和两周内的 6 次治疗后,记录颈部残疾指数、数字疼痛评分量表和颈椎测角器。使用 SPSS 21 进行数据分析。
结果:60 例患者中,每组各有 20 例(33.3%)。第 1 组的平均年龄为 32.25±9.56 岁,第 2 组为 2.35±9.05 岁,第 3 组为 32.75±7.82 岁。治疗后,颈痛残疾指数和数字疼痛评分量表评分以及向右侧和左侧旋转的评分在三组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。组内分析显示,所有组在治疗后所有参数均有显著改善(p<0.0001)。
结论:急性机械性颈痛采用等长松弛技术治疗,在减轻疼痛和残疾以及改善活动度方面效果更快、更显著。