Suppr超能文献

麻醉期间液体渗入“第三间隙”,一篇评论。

Fluid escapes to the "third space" during anesthesia, a commentary.

作者信息

Hahn Robert G

机构信息

Research Unit, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.

Karolinska Institutet at Danderyds Hospital (KIDS), Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Apr;65(4):451-456. doi: 10.1111/aas.13740. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The "third fluid space" is a concept that has caused much confusion for more than half a century, dividing anesthesiologists into believers and non-believers.

AIM

To challenge the existence of the "third fluid space" based on analysis of crystalloid fluid kinetics.

METHODS

Data on hemodilution patterns from 157 infusion experiments performed in volunteers and from 85 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were studied by population volume kinetic analysis. Elimination of infused crystalloid fluid from the kinetic model could occur either as urine or "third space" accumulation. The latter fluid volume remained in the body, but without equilibrating with the plasma within the 3-4 h of the experiment.

RESULTS

The rate constant for "third space" loss of fluid accounted for 20% of the elimination in conscious volunteers and for 75% during general anesthesia and surgery. The two elimination constants showed a reciprocal relationship, resulting in that "third-space" losses increase when urinary excretion is restricted. The effect on the plasma volume was smaller than indicated by these figures because fluid distributed to the extravascular space continuously redistributed to the plasma. Worked-out examples show that one-third of an infused crystalloid volume has been confined to the "third space" after 3 h of surgery. When equilibration with the plasma eventually occurs, which is necessary for excretion of the fluid, is not known.

CONCLUSION

During anesthesia and surgery one third of the infused crystalloid fluid is at least temporarily unavailable for excretion, which probably contributes to postoperative weight increase and edema.

摘要

背景

“第三间隙液”这一概念在半个多世纪以来一直令人困惑,使麻醉医生分为支持者和反对者两派。

目的

基于对晶体液动力学的分析,对“第三间隙液”的存在提出质疑。

方法

通过群体容量动力学分析,研究了在志愿者身上进行的157次输液实验以及85例接受全身麻醉手术患者的血液稀释模式数据。注入的晶体液从动力学模型中的消除可能以尿液形式或“第三间隙”积聚的形式出现。后一种液体量留在体内,但在实验的3 - 4小时内未与血浆达到平衡。

结果

“第三间隙”液体丢失的速率常数在清醒志愿者中占消除量的20%,在全身麻醉和手术期间占75%。这两个消除常数呈现出反比关系,导致当尿液排泄受限时“第三间隙”的丢失增加。对血浆容量的影响小于这些数字所显示的,因为分布到血管外间隙的液体不断重新分布到血浆中。实例表明,手术3小时后,注入晶体液体积的三分之一被限制在“第三间隙”。目前尚不清楚液体最终与血浆达到平衡(这是液体排泄所必需的)的时间。

结论

在麻醉和手术期间,注入的晶体液至少有三分之一暂时无法用于排泄,这可能导致术后体重增加和水肿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fd5/7983898/5fc434305a00/AAS-65-451-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验