Mura Mathilde, Della Schiava Nellie, Long Anne, Chirico Erica N, Pialoux Vincent, Millon Antoine
Univ Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Interuniversity Laboratory of Human Movement Biology EA7424, Lyon, France.
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1273. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1974.
Vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques are characterised by several risk factors, such as inflammation, neovascularization and intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH). Vulnerable plaques can lead to ischemic events such as stroke. Many studies reported a relationship between IPH, plaque rupture, and ischemic stroke. Histology is the gold standard to evaluate IPH, but it required carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery to collect the tissue sample. In this context, several imaging methods can be used as a non-invasive way to evaluate plaque vulnerability and detect IPH. Most imaging studies showed that IPH is associated with plaque vulnerability and stroke, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the most sensitive and specific to detect IPH as a predictor of ischemic events. These conclusions are however still debated because of the limited number of patients included in these studies; further studies are required to better assess risks associated with different IPH stages. Moreover, IPH is implicated in plaque vulnerability with other risk factors which need to be considered to predict ischemic risk. In addition, MRI sequences standardization is required to compare results from different studies and agree on biomarkers that need to be considered to predict plaque rupture. In these circumstances, IPH detection by MRI could be an efficient clinical method to predict stroke. The goal of this review article is to first describe the pathophysiological process responsible for IPH, its histological detection in carotid plaques and its correlation with plaque rupture. The second part will discuss the benefits and limitations of imaging the carotid plaque, and finally the clinical interest of imaging IPH to predict plaque rupture, focusing on MRI-IPH.
易损性颈动脉粥样硬化斑块具有多种危险因素,如炎症、新生血管形成和斑块内出血(IPH)。易损斑块可导致缺血性事件,如中风。许多研究报道了IPH、斑块破裂和缺血性中风之间的关系。组织学是评估IPH的金标准,但需要进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)来收集组织样本。在这种情况下,几种成像方法可作为评估斑块易损性和检测IPH的非侵入性方法。大多数成像研究表明,IPH与斑块易损性和中风相关,磁共振成像(MRI)是检测IPH作为缺血性事件预测指标最敏感和特异的方法。然而,由于这些研究纳入的患者数量有限,这些结论仍存在争议;需要进一步研究以更好地评估与不同IPH阶段相关的风险。此外,IPH与其他需要考虑以预测缺血风险的危险因素一起参与斑块易损性。此外,需要进行MRI序列标准化,以便比较不同研究的结果,并就预测斑块破裂所需考虑的生物标志物达成共识。在这种情况下,通过MRI检测IPH可能是预测中风的一种有效临床方法。这篇综述文章的目的首先是描述导致IPH的病理生理过程、其在颈动脉斑块中的组织学检测及其与斑块破裂的相关性。第二部分将讨论颈动脉斑块成像的益处和局限性,最后讨论成像IPH预测斑块破裂的临床意义,重点是MRI-IPH。