Suppr超能文献

评估医院绩效指标。哪些维度?来自伞式综述的证据。

Assessing hospital performance indicators. What dimensions? Evidence from an umbrella review.

机构信息

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05879-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' increasing needs and expectations require an overall assessment of hospital performance. Several international agencies have defined performance indicators sets but there exists no unanimous classification. The Impact HTA Horizon2020 Project wants to address this aspect, developing a toolkit of key indicators to measure hospital performance. The aim of this review is to identify and classify the dimensions of hospital performance indicators in order to develop a common language and identify a shared evidence-based way to frame and address performance assessment.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA statement, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were queried to perform an umbrella review. Reviews focusing on hospital settings, published January 2000-June 2019 were considered. The quality of the studies selected was assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool.

RESULTS

Six reviews ranging 2002-2014 were included. The following dimensions were described in at least half of the studies: 6 studies classified efficiency (55 indicators analyzed); 5 studies classified effectiveness (13 indicators), patient centeredness (10 indicators) and safety (8 indicators); 3 studies responsive governance (2 indicators), staff orientation (10 indicators) and timeliness (4 indicators). Three reviews did not specify the indicators related to the dimensions listed, and one article gave a complete definition of the meaning of each dimension and of the related indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The research shows emphasis of the importance of patient centeredness, effectiveness, efficiency, and safety dimensions. Especially, greater attention is given to the dimensions of effectiveness and efficiency. Assessing the overall quality of clinical pathways is key in guaranteeing a truly effective and efficient system but, to date, there still exists a lack of awareness and proactivity in terms of measuring performance of nodes within networks. The effort of classifying and systematizing performance measurement techniques across hospitals is essential at the organizational, regional/national and possibly international levels to deliver top quality care to patients.

摘要

背景

患者不断增长的需求和期望要求对医院绩效进行全面评估。几个国际机构已经定义了绩效指标集,但没有统一的分类。“影响 HTA Horizon2020 项目”旨在解决这一方面的问题,开发一套关键指标工具包来衡量医院绩效。本研究旨在确定和分类医院绩效指标的维度,以便建立共同的语言,并确定一种基于共同证据的方法来构建和解决绩效评估。

方法

根据 PRISMA 声明,检索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库以进行伞式审查。考虑了 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月发表的以医院为重点的综述。使用 AMSTAR2 工具评估所选研究的质量。

结果

纳入了 6 项综述,发表时间为 2002-2014 年。以下维度在至少一半的研究中进行了描述:6 项研究对效率进行了分类(分析了 55 项指标);5 项研究对有效性(13 项指标)、以患者为中心(10 项指标)和安全性(8 项指标)进行了分类;3 项研究对响应性治理(2 项指标)、员工定位(10 项指标)和及时性(4 项指标)进行了分类。有 3 项综述没有具体说明与列出维度相关的指标,有 1 篇文章完整定义了每个维度及其相关指标的含义。

结论

研究表明,以患者为中心、有效性、效率和安全性维度的重要性受到重视。特别是,对有效性和效率维度的重视程度更大。评估临床路径的整体质量是确保真正有效和高效系统的关键,但迄今为止,在衡量网络中节点的绩效方面,仍然缺乏意识和主动性。对医院间绩效衡量技术进行分类和系统化的努力对于在组织、区域/国家和可能的国际层面为患者提供高质量的护理至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验