Department of Healthcare Leadership & Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Center for Telehealth-Telehealth Center of Excellence, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Sep;27(9):1011-1020. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0349. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Since 2003, the University of Mississippi Medical Center has operated a robust telehealth emergency department (ED) network, TelEmergency, which enhances access to emergency medicine-trained physicians at participating rural hospitals. TelEmergency was developed as a cost-control measure for financially constrained rural hospitals to improve access to quality, emergency care. However, the literature remains unclear as to whether ED telehealth services can be provided at lower costs compared with traditional in-person ED services. Our objective was to empirically determine whether TelEmergency was associated with lower ED costs at rural hospitals when compared with similar hospitals without TelEmergency between 2010 and 2017. A panel of data for 2010-2017 was constructed at the hospital level. Hospitals with TelEmergency ( = 14 hospitals; 112 hospital-years) were compared with similar hospitals that did not use TelEmergency from Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, and South Carolina ( = 102; 766 hospital-years), matched using Coarsened Exact Matching. The relationship between total ED costs and treatment (e.g., participation in TelEmergency) was predicted using generalized estimating equations with a Poisson distribution, a log link, an exchangeable error term, and robust standard errors. After controlling for ownership type, critical access hospital status, year, and size, TelEmergency was associated with an estimated 31.4% lower total annual ED costs compared with similar matched hospitals that did not provide TelEmergency. TelEmergency utilization was associated with significantly lower total annual ED costs compared with similarly matched hospitals that did not utilize TelEmergency. These findings suggest that access to quality ED care in rural communities can occur at lower costs.
自 2003 年以来,密西西比大学医学中心运营了一个强大的远程医疗急诊部(ED)网络,TelEmergency,该网络增强了参与农村医院的急诊医学培训医生的可及性。TelEmergency 的开发是为了控制经济拮据的农村医院的成本,以改善获得高质量急诊护理的机会。然而,文献对于远程医疗急诊服务是否可以比传统的现场 ED 服务成本更低仍不清楚。我们的目的是从实证上确定 2010 年至 2017 年期间,与没有 TelEmergency 的农村医院相比,TelEmergency 是否与农村医院的 ED 成本降低相关。在医院层面构建了 2010-2017 年的数据面板。将使用 TelEmergency 的医院( = 14 家医院;112 个医院年)与来自阿肯色州、佐治亚州、密西西比州和南卡罗来纳州的没有使用 TelEmergency 的类似医院( = 102 家;766 个医院年)进行比较,使用粗化精确匹配进行匹配。使用泊松分布、对数链接、可交换误差项和稳健标准误差的广义估计方程预测 ED 总费用与治疗(例如,参与 TelEmergency)之间的关系。在控制了所有权类型、关键访问医院状态、年份和规模后,与没有提供 TelEmergency 的类似匹配医院相比,TelEmergency 每年的 ED 总成本估计降低了 31.4%。TelEmergency 的使用与没有使用 TelEmergency 的类似匹配医院相比,每年的 ED 总成本显著降低。这些发现表明,在农村社区可以以更低的成本获得高质量的 ED 护理。