Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Nov;66(11):3740-3752. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06707-3. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) improves short-term outcomes for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients hospitalized for acute flares. Longer-term impacts and cost-effectiveness are unknown.
We compared disease outcomes and cost-effectiveness of HBOT in addition to standard of care versus standard of care alone for UC patients hospitalized for acute flares using a microsimulation model. Published literature was used for transition probabilities, costs, and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimates. We modeled 100,000 individuals in each group over a 5-year horizon and compared rates of re-hospitalization, rescue medical therapy, colectomy, death, and cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with 500 samples and 250 trials, in addition to multiple microsimulation sensitivity analyses.
The use of HBOT at the time of index hospitalization for an acute UC flare is projected to reduce the risk of re-hospitalization, inpatient rescue medical therapy, and inpatient emergent colectomy by over 60% (p < 0.001) and mortality by over 30% (p <0.001), during a 5-year horizon. The HBOT strategy costs more ($5600 incremental cost) but also yielded higher QALYs (0.13 incremental yield), resulting in this strategy being cost-effective ($43,000/QALY). Results were sensitive to HBOT costs and rates of endoscopic improvement with HBOT. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses observed HBOT to be more cost-effective than standard of care in 95% of iterations.
The use of HBOT to optimize response to steroids during the index hospitalization for an acute UC flare is cost-effective and is projected to result in significant reductions in disease-related complications in the long term.
高压氧疗法(HBOT)可改善因急性发作而住院的溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的短期预后。但其长期影响和成本效益尚不清楚。
我们使用微观模拟模型比较了在因急性发作而住院的 UC 患者中,HBOT 联合标准治疗与单独标准治疗在疾病结局和成本效益方面的差异。我们使用已发表的文献资料来估算转移概率、成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。我们在 5 年的时间内对每组 10 万人进行建模,并比较了再住院率、抢救性医疗、结肠切除术、死亡率和在支付意愿为 10 万美元/QALY 时的成本效益。我们进行了概率敏感性分析,有 500 个样本和 250 次试验,此外还进行了多次微观模拟敏感性分析。
在因急性 UC 发作而住院的情况下,HBOT 的应用预计将降低 60%以上(p<0.001)的再住院风险、住院抢救性医疗和紧急结肠切除术风险,以及 30%以上(p<0.001)的死亡率,在 5 年的时间内。HBOT 策略的成本更高(增加 5600 美元),但也产生了更高的 QALY(增加 0.13),因此该策略具有成本效益(43000 美元/QALY)。结果对 HBOT 成本和 HBOT 内镜改善率敏感。概率敏感性分析观察到 HBOT 在 95%的迭代中比标准治疗更具成本效益。
在因急性 UC 发作而住院期间,使用 HBOT 优化对类固醇的反应具有成本效益,预计可长期显著降低疾病相关并发症的发生率。