Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL3 8AA, UK.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb;36(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Research on how competitors assess (i.e., gather information on) fighting ability and contested resources, as well as how assessment impacts on contest processes and outcomes, has been fundamental to the field of dyadic (one-on-one) contests. Despite recent growth in studies of contests between social-living groups, there is limited understanding of assessment during these intergroup contests. We adapt current knowledge of dyadic contest assessment to the intergroup case, describing what traits of groups, group members, and resources are assessed, and how assessment is manifested in contest processes (e.g., behaviors) and outcomes. This synthesis helps to explain the role of individual heterogeneity in assessment and how groups are shaped by the selective pressure of contests.
关于竞争对手如何评估(即收集有关战斗能力和竞争资源的信息),以及评估如何影响竞争过程和结果的研究,一直是对偶(一对一)竞争领域的基础。尽管最近对社会群体之间的竞争研究有所增加,但对这些群体间竞争中的评估了解有限。我们将当前对偶竞争评估的知识应用于群体间的情况,描述了群体、群体成员和资源的哪些特征被评估,以及评估如何在竞争过程(例如行为)和结果中表现出来。这种综合有助于解释个体异质性在评估中的作用,以及群体如何受到竞争的选择性压力的影响。