Suppr超能文献

用于构音障碍语音的自动语音识别平台评估

Evaluation of an Automatic Speech Recognition Platform for Dysarthric Speech.

作者信息

Calvo Irene, Tropea Peppino, Viganò Mauro, Scialla Maria, Cavalcante Agnieszka B, Grajzer Monika, Gilardone Marco, Corbo Massimo

机构信息

Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy,

出版信息

Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021;73(5):432-441. doi: 10.1159/000511042. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of commercially available automatic speech recognition (ASR) software is challenged when dysarthria accompanies a physical disability. To overcome this issue, a mobile and personal speech assistant (mPASS) platform was developed, using a speaker-dependent ASR software.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the proposed platform and to compare mPASS recognition accuracy to a commercial speaker-independent ASR software. In addition, secondary aims were to investigate the relationship between severity of dysarthria and accuracy and to explore people with dysarthria perceptions on the proposed platform.

METHODS

Fifteen individuals with dysarthric speech and 20 individuals with nondysarthric speech recorded 24 words and 5 sentences in a clinical environment. Differences in recognition accuracy between the two systems were evaluated. In addition, mPASS usability was assessed with a technology acceptance model (TAM) questionnaire.

RESULTS

In both groups, mean accuracy rates were significantly higher with mPASS compared to the commercial ASR for words and for sentences. mPASS reached good levels of usefulness and ease of use according to the TAM questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Practical applicability of this technology is realistic: the mPASS platform is accurate, and it could be easily used by individuals with dysarthria.

摘要

引言

当构音障碍伴有身体残疾时,商用自动语音识别(ASR)软件的使用面临挑战。为克服这一问题,开发了一种移动个人语音助手(mPASS)平台,使用了依赖说话者的ASR软件。

目的

本研究的目的是评估所提出平台的性能,并将mPASS的识别准确率与商用独立于说话者的ASR软件进行比较。此外,次要目的是研究构音障碍严重程度与准确率之间的关系,并探索构音障碍患者对所提出平台的看法。

方法

15名构音障碍患者和20名非构音障碍患者在临床环境中录制了24个单词和5个句子。评估了两个系统在识别准确率上的差异。此外,使用技术接受模型(TAM)问卷对mPASS的可用性进行了评估。

结果

在两组中,与商用ASR相比,mPASS在单词和句子方面的平均准确率显著更高。根据TAM问卷,mPASS达到了良好的有用性和易用性水平。

结论

这项技术的实际适用性是现实的:mPASS平台准确,构音障碍患者可以轻松使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验