Biology Department, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, California, 92182, USA.
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California, 95616, USA.
Ecology. 2021 Feb;102(2):e03244. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3244. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
Burrowing animals can profoundly influence the structure of surrounding communities, as well as the performance of individual species. Changes in the community structure of burrowing animals or plants together with changing abiotic parameters could shift the influence of burrowers on surrounding habitats. For example, prior studies in salt marshes suggest that fiddler crabs stimulate cordgrass production, but leaf-grazing crabs suppress cordgrass production. Unfortunately, testing this prediction and others are impeded because few studies have examined crab impacts on the plant community and across multiple sites, multiple years, or both. This challenges our ability to predict how burrowing animals will influence plant community structure, and when and where these impacts will occur. We manipulated the densities of the dominant burrowing crabs in plant assemblages dominated by Pacific cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) and perennial pickleweed (Sarcocornia pacifica) at three sites in southern California for three years (2016, 2017, 2018). Crab impacts on plant community structure differed among each of our three sites. In contrast to our predictions, (1) leaf-grazing crabs (Pachygrapsus crassipes) had positive effects on cordgrass cover at one site and no effect on cordgrass production at a nearby site in the same marsh and (2) fiddler crabs (Uca crenulata) did not stimulate cordgrass production at another marsh. Because crabs affected traits of cordgrass, but not pickleweed, in the direction consistent with changes in cordgrass cover, we propose that marsh-specific crab effects on community structure were largely mediated through changes in cordgrass, as opposed to pickleweed. Importantly, crabs facilitated cordgrass during marsh-wide cordgrass loss, suggesting that crabs may mitigate environmental stress for this ecologically important plant. Because cordgrass abundance can be a critical measure of marsh functioning and is often a restoration target, we suggest that managing cordgrass populations would benefit from additional information about crab populations and their impacts among years, and among and within marshes.
穴居动物可以深刻地影响周围群落的结构,以及单个物种的表现。穴居动物或植物的群落结构变化以及非生物参数的变化可能会改变穴居动物对周围栖息地的影响。例如,先前在盐沼中的研究表明,招潮蟹刺激了大米草的生长,但食叶蟹则抑制了大米草的生长。不幸的是,由于很少有研究同时在多个地点、多年或两者之间检验了蟹类对植物群落的影响及其预测,因此对这一预测和其他预测的检验受到了阻碍。这就挑战了我们预测穴居动物将如何影响植物群落结构,以及这些影响何时何地发生的能力。我们在加利福尼亚州南部的三个地点对由太平洋大米草(Spartina foliosa)和多年生盐角草(Sarcocornia pacifica)组成的植物组合中的优势穴居蟹的密度进行了三年(2016 年、2017 年和 2018 年)的操纵。蟹类对植物群落结构的影响在我们的三个地点各不相同。与我们的预测相反,(1)食叶蟹(Pachygrapsus crassipes)对一个地点的大米草覆盖率有积极影响,而对同一沼泽地附近的另一个地点的大米草产量没有影响,(2)招潮蟹(Uca crenulata)在另一个沼泽地并没有刺激大米草的生长。由于蟹类对大米草的特征产生了影响,但对盐角草没有影响,这与大米草覆盖率的变化方向一致,因此我们提出,沼泽地特定的蟹类对群落结构的影响主要是通过改变大米草来实现的,而不是盐角草。重要的是,蟹类在整个沼泽地大米草大量减少的情况下促进了大米草的生长,这表明蟹类可能减轻了这种对生态重要的植物的环境压力。由于大米草的丰度是衡量沼泽地功能的一个关键指标,而且通常是恢复的目标,因此我们建议,在多年间以及在沼泽地之间和内部,管理大米草种群将受益于有关蟹类种群及其影响的更多信息。