Suppr超能文献

识别一组与患者相关的特征,以促进痴呆症老年患者特定抗精神病药物的安全处方。

Identification of a Set of Patient-Related Features to Foster Safe Prescribing of Specific Antipsychotics in the Elderly With Dementia.

作者信息

Aguiar João Pedro, Bernardo Catarina, Gama Marques João, Leufkens Hubert, Alves da Costa Filipa

机构信息

Faculdade de Farmácia, Research Institute for Medicines (iMED.ULisboa), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz (IUEM), Caparica, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 30;11:604201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.604201. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Antipsychotics (APs) are widely used to manage behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia, although with a variety of adverse drug reactions. Therefore, it is important to know which patient-related features should be considered to foster a safe prescribing of these medications. To compile and validate a set of patient-related features (PRFs) to foster safe prescribing of specific APs in the elderly with dementia; and to evaluate the feasibility of using them in clinical practice by analyzing the exhaustiveness of medical records. A rapid literature review was the starting point, where PRFs were identified through a search in PubMed combined with information from the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). In the next step, a two-round e-Delphi survey was undertaken, where a total of 450 participants were invited by e-mail, including prescribers and specialists in benefit-risk assessment. Finally, a cross-sectional study was undertaken, where 100 patients were randomly extracted from the psychiatric hospital database. Outcomes were defined as the assessment of the clinical relevance and feasibility of the PRFs, and the level of exhaustiveness of these features in medical records. Data analysis was performed using univariate statistics (IBM SPSS v.23.0). A total of 92 experts participated in the e-Delphi. Forty-seven PRFs obtained consensus, where 12 were applicable to haloperidol, 14 to olanzapine/risperidone, 13 to quetiapine, and 8 to aripiprazole. Age, comorbidities, and co-medications were rated as important features regardless of the prescribed drug. All PRFs were rated as always or frequently available and, if not, they were easy or partially easy to obtain. Age, comorbidities, and co-medications were always available in the medical records, whereas cognitive status (between 41.4 and 78.8%) or hepatic function (between 17.2 and 30.4%) presented a low-level of exhaustiveness. Even though a high number of PRFs were rated as clinically relevant, some of them were identified as frequently missing from medical records. This may suggest that medical records should be complemented with other sources (e.g., nursing and pharmacy records) to ensure a safe prescribing of APs.

摘要

抗精神病药物(APs)被广泛用于管理痴呆症患者的行为和精神症状,尽管会产生各种药物不良反应。因此,了解哪些患者相关特征应被考虑以促进这些药物的安全处方非常重要。 汇编并验证一组患者相关特征(PRFs),以促进在老年痴呆症患者中安全处方特定的抗精神病药物;并通过分析医疗记录的详尽程度来评估在临床实践中使用这些特征的可行性。 快速文献综述是起点,通过在PubMed中搜索并结合产品特性摘要(SmPCs)中的信息来确定PRFs。下一步,进行了两轮电子德尔菲调查,通过电子邮件共邀请了450名参与者,包括开处方者和获益风险评估专家。最后,进行了一项横断面研究,从精神病医院数据库中随机抽取了100名患者。结果被定义为对PRFs的临床相关性和可行性的评估,以及这些特征在医疗记录中的详尽程度。使用单变量统计(IBM SPSS v.23.0)进行数据分析。 共有92名专家参与了电子德尔菲调查。47个PRFs达成了共识,其中12个适用于氟哌啶醇,14个适用于奥氮平/利培酮,13个适用于喹硫平,8个适用于阿立哌唑。无论开具何种药物,年龄、合并症和联合用药都被评为重要特征。所有PRFs都被评为总是或经常可用,如果不可用,也很容易或部分容易获得。年龄、合并症和联合用药在医疗记录中总是可用的,而认知状态(41.4%至78.8%)或肝功能(17.2%至30.4%)的详尽程度较低。 尽管大量PRFs被评为具有临床相关性,但其中一些被确定为在医疗记录中经常缺失。这可能表明医疗记录应辅以其他来源(如护理和药房记录),以确保抗精神病药物的安全处方。

相似文献

1
Identification of a Set of Patient-Related Features to Foster Safe Prescribing of Specific Antipsychotics in the Elderly With Dementia.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 30;11:604201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.604201. eCollection 2020.
2
Using antipsychotic agents in older patients.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65 Suppl 2:5-99; discussion 100-102; quiz 103-4.
3
5
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5.
8
10
Antipsychotics for delirium.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD005594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005594.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Contribution of Different Patient Information Sources to Create the Best Possible Medication History.
Acta Med Port. 2020 Jun 1;33(6):384-389. doi: 10.20344/amp.12082. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Development of prescribing safety indicators related to mental health disorders and medications: Modified e-Delphi study.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):189-209. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14391. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Identifying potential prescribing safety indicators related to mental health disorders and medications: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0217406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217406. eCollection 2019.
6
Choosing wisely? Quantifying the extent of three low value psychotropic prescribing practices in Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3811-5.
7
The South Region Cancer Registry: an evaluation of its exhaustiveness in a cohort of lung cancer patients.
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Feb;10(2):330-334. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12915. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
8
Prescribing of psychotropic drugs and indicators for use in residential aged care and residents with dementia.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Jun;31(6):837-847. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001229. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
9
Prescribing antipsychotics in older people: A mini-review.
Maturitas. 2018 Oct;116:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验