Suppr超能文献

三维打印辅助腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与传统肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿瘤患者的系统评价和Meta分析

Three-Dimensional Printing Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy vs. Conventional Nephrectomy in Patients With Complex Renal Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jiang Yingcheng, Zeng Huimin, Zhu Zewu, Chen Jinbo, Chen Hequn

机构信息

Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;10:551985. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551985. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically assess the influence of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) of complex renal tumors. A systematic literature review was performed in June 2020 using the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wanfang Databases to identify relevant studies. The data relative to operation time, warm ischemic time, intraoperative blood loss, positive surgical margin, reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and complications (including artery embolization, hematoma, urinary fistula, transfusion, hematuria, intraoperative bleeding, and fever) were extracted. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of all included studies, and the eligible studies were included and analyzed using the Stata 12.1 software. A subgroup analysis was performed stratifying patients according to the complexity of the tumor and surgery type or to the nephrometry score. One randomized controlled trial (RCT), two prospective controlled studies (PCS), and seven retrospective comparative studies (RCS) were analyzed, involving a total of 647 patients. Our meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in operation time, warm ischemic time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction in eGFR, and complications between the LPN with 3D-preoperative assessment (LPN-3DPA) vs. LPN with conventional 2D preoperative assessment (LPN-C2DPA) groups. Positive surgical margin did not differ significantly. The LPN-3DPA group showed shorter operation time and warm ischemic time, as well as less intraoperative blood loss, reduction in eGFR, fewer complications for patients with complex renal tumor. Therefore, LPN assisted by three-dimensional printing technology should be a preferable treatment of complex renal tumor when compared with conventional LPN. However, further large-scale RCTs are needed in the future to confirm these findings.

摘要

本荟萃分析的目的是系统评估三维(3D)打印技术在复杂肾肿瘤腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)中的影响。2020年6月,我们使用科学网、PubMed、Embase、考克兰图书馆、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库进行了系统的文献综述,以识别相关研究。提取了与手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血量、手术切缘阳性、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低以及并发症(包括动脉栓塞、血肿、尿瘘、输血、血尿、术中出血和发热)相关的数据。两名研究者独立评估了所有纳入研究的质量,并使用Stata 12.1软件对符合条件的研究进行纳入和分析。根据肿瘤和手术类型的复杂性或肾计量评分对患者进行分层,进行亚组分析。分析了1项随机对照试验(RCT)、2项前瞻性对照研究(PCS)和7项回顾性比较研究(RCS),共涉及647例患者。我们的荟萃分析表明,术前三维评估的LPN(LPN-3DPA)组与传统二维术前评估的LPN(LPN-C2DPA)组在手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血量、eGFR降低和并发症方面存在显著差异。手术切缘阳性率无显著差异。LPN-3DPA组手术时间和热缺血时间更短,术中出血量更少,eGFR降低更少,对于复杂肾肿瘤患者并发症更少。因此,与传统LPN相比,三维打印技术辅助的LPN应该是治疗复杂肾肿瘤的更优选择。然而,未来需要进一步的大规模RCT来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24fb/7643019/094720e9260e/fonc-10-551985-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验