Division of Rheumatology & Immunology Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, DUMC, Box 2918, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 May;40(5):2021-2026. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05506-5. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
We sought to determine if analyzing internal medicine (IM) resident performance on the in-training exam (ITE) might reveal curricular needs in rheumatology education beyond those intuitive to learners and educators from their perceptions and experience. We analyzed ITE scores of post-graduate year (PGY) 2 IM residents at our institution from 2010 to 2017. We sorted rheumatology-related educational objectives on the ITEs into 10 disease categories and calculated average scores. We then surveyed our IM residents' self-reported confidence and rheumatology educators' perceptions of IM resident proficiency in the 10 categories on a 10-point Likert scale. Finally, we tallied diagnoses in each category encountered by IM residents in rheumatology clinic. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for the relationship between these data. The ITEs exposed 402 residents to 63 rheumatology-related educational objectives in the 10 categories; 24 objectives were categorized as "other." Survey respondents included 38 residents and 22 educators. There was no correlation between ITE scores in the 10 categories and resident confidence (r = - 0.226, p = 0.530), educator perception (r = - 0.274, p = 0.445), or diagnoses encountered (r = - 0.310, p = 0.383). There was a strong positive correlation between resident confidence and educator perception (r = 0.934, p < 0.001). ITE performance was low in crystalline arthritis and osteoarthritis despite high resident confidence, educator perception, and number of diagnoses seen. Our analysis of IM resident ITE performance identified curricular gaps not apparent in surveys of learner and educator perceptions or an assessment of learner experience. Key Points • In this study, we demonstrate how a systematic analysis of internal medicine resident performance on the in-training exam can identify important curricular gaps in rheumatology education that are not apparent in assessments of learners and educator perceptions or learner experience in rheumatology clinic. • In-training exam performance was low in crystalline arthritis and osteoarthritis despite high resident confidence, educator perception of proficiency, and number of diagnoses seen in these categories. • When rheumatology curricula for internal medicine residents are developed solely on the basis of learner and educator perceptions, common disorders traditionally considered "easy" may be overlooked.
我们试图确定,分析内科住院医师在住院医师培训考试(ITE)中的表现是否可以揭示风湿病教育中的课程需求,这些需求超出了学习者和教育者从他们的感知和经验中所认为的和体验到的需求。我们分析了 2010 年至 2017 年我院住院医师培训第二年的住院医师 ITE 成绩。我们将 ITE 上与风湿病相关的教育目标分为 10 种疾病类别,并计算平均分数。然后,我们对住院医师进行了自我报告的信心调查,并对住院医师在 10 个类别中的风湿病教育者的认知程度进行了 10 分制的李克特量表调查。最后,我们统计了住院医师在风湿病诊所遇到的每个类别的诊断。为了研究这些数据之间的关系,计算了 Pearson 相关系数。ITE 使 402 名住院医师接触到 10 个类别的 63 个与风湿病相关的教育目标;24 个目标被归类为“其他”。调查对象包括 38 名住院医师和 22 名教育工作者。10 个类别的 ITE 得分与住院医师的信心(r = -0.226,p = 0.530)、教育者的认知(r = -0.274,p = 0.445)或诊断(r = -0.310,p = 0.383)之间均无相关性。住院医师的信心与教育者的认知之间存在很强的正相关(r = 0.934,p < 0.001)。尽管住院医师的信心、教育者的认知和诊断数量都很高,但晶体性关节炎和骨关节炎的 ITE 表现却很低。我们对内科住院医师 ITE 表现的分析发现了学习者和教育者认知或学习者在风湿病诊所的经验评估中不明显的课程差距。关键点• 在这项研究中,我们展示了如何对内科住院医师在住院医师培训考试中的表现进行系统分析,可以确定风湿病教育中的重要课程差距,这些差距在学习者和教育者认知或学习者在风湿病诊所的经验评估中并不明显。• 尽管住院医师的信心、教育者对熟练程度的认知以及在这些类别中看到的诊断数量都很高,但晶体性关节炎和骨关节炎的 ITE 表现却很低。• 当为内科住院医师制定风湿病课程时,如果仅基于学习者和教育者的认知,那么传统上认为“简单”的常见疾病可能会被忽视。