Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Institute for Health System Innovation and Policy, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
F1000Res. 2020 Jul 15;9:707. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24934.1. eCollection 2020.
In the debate over prescription drug pricing, some pharmaceutical industry critics claim that U.S. taxpayers pay twice for costly therapies, because publicly supported research is a major contributor to drug discovery and American taxpayers are inadequately rewarded for their research investment due to high drug prices. In fact, the empirical evidence supporting these claims is weak, and the pay twice argument distracts from important efforts to ensure that impactful new drugs continue to be developed and made widely available to patients who need them.
在关于处方药定价的争论中,一些制药行业的批评者声称,美国纳税人要为昂贵的疗法支付两次费用,因为公共支持的研究是药物发现的主要贡献者,而由于药品价格高,美国纳税人的研究投资回报不足。事实上,这些说法的经验证据是薄弱的,而“双重付费”的论点分散了确保有影响力的新药继续开发并广泛提供给需要的患者的重要努力。