• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝门部胆管癌与良性疾病鉴别诊断的困境:单中心回顾性研究。

Dilemma of the differential diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and benign diseases: a single-center retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Innovation Institute of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Carcinogenesis. 2021 Apr 17;42(3):442-447. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa125.

DOI:10.1093/carcin/bgaa125
PMID:33206166
Abstract

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), which lacks specific clinical manifestations, remains very difficult to distinguish from benign disease. This distinction is further complicated by the complex hilar anatomy. We conducted the present study to evaluate the differential diagnosis of these conditions. Sixty-five patients underwent resection surgery for suspected HCCA between January 2011 and October 2018. Institutional Review Board of Shengjing hospital agreed this study and all participants sign an informed consent document prior to participation in a research study. Following a postoperative pathology analysis, all patients were divided into two groups: malignant group (54 patients with HCCA) and benign group (11 cases with benign lesions). Compared with the benign group, the malignant group had a significantly higher median age and serum CA19-9, CEA, ALT, BILT and BILD levels (P < 0.05). In contrast, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of the sex distribution, clinical manifestations, serum levels of AST and ALKP, and imaging findings. In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we identified a CA19-9 cutoff point of 233.15 U/ml for the differential diagnosis and CEA cutoff point of 2.98 ng/ml for the differential diagnosis. The differential diagnosis of HCCA and benign hilar lesions remains difficult. However, we found that patients with HCCA tended to have an older age at onset and higher serum levels of CA19-9, CEA, BILT, ALT and BILD. Furthermore, patients with a serum CA19-9 level >233.15 U/ml and CEA level >2.98 ng/ml are more likely to have malignant disease.

摘要

肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)缺乏特定的临床表现,与良性疾病仍难以区分。这种区别由于肝门部复杂的解剖结构而变得更加复杂。我们进行了本研究,以评估这些情况的鉴别诊断。2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月期间,65 例患者因疑似 HCCA 接受了切除术。盛景医院的机构审查委员会同意了这项研究,所有参与者在参与研究之前都签署了知情同意书。术后病理分析后,所有患者分为两组:恶性组(54 例 HCCA)和良性组(11 例良性病变)。与良性组相比,恶性组的中位年龄和血清 CA19-9、CEA、ALT、BILT 和 BILD 水平显著更高(P<0.05)。相比之下,两组在性别分布、临床表现、血清 AST 和 ALKP 水平以及影像学发现方面无显著差异。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,我们确定了 CA19-9 的截断值为 233.15 U/ml 用于鉴别诊断和 CEA 的截断值为 2.98 ng/ml 用于鉴别诊断。HCCA 和良性肝门部病变的鉴别诊断仍然困难。然而,我们发现 HCCA 患者发病年龄较大,血清 CA19-9、CEA、BILT、ALT 和 BILD 水平较高。此外,血清 CA19-9 水平>233.15 U/ml 和 CEA 水平>2.98 ng/ml 的患者更可能患有恶性疾病。

相似文献

1
Dilemma of the differential diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and benign diseases: a single-center retrospective study.肝门部胆管癌与良性疾病鉴别诊断的困境:单中心回顾性研究。
Carcinogenesis. 2021 Apr 17;42(3):442-447. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa125.
2
Assessment of clinical outcomes of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.评估肝门部胆管癌的临床结局。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Apr;17(2):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
[Surgical therapy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma].[肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗]
Chirurg. 2006 Apr;77(4):325-34. doi: 10.1007/s00104-006-1177-4.
4
[Pathologic liver findings? Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) with central calcinosis].[肝脏病理检查结果?肝门部胆管癌(克氏壶腹肿瘤)伴中央钙化]
Radiologe. 1997 Mar;37(3):255-7. doi: 10.1007/s001170050208.
5
Surgical strategies in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor).肝门部胆管癌(Klatskin 肿瘤)患者的手术策略。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):581-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2109-x. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
Clinical Significance of Preoperative Serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 Levels in Predicting the Resectability of Cholangiocarcinoma.术前血清 CEA、CA125 和 CA19-9 水平对预测胆管癌可切除性的临床意义。
Dis Markers. 2019 Feb 4;2019:6016931. doi: 10.1155/2019/6016931. eCollection 2019.
7
Detection of serum MMP-7 and MMP-9 in cholangiocarcinoma patients: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.胆管癌患者血清基质金属蛋白酶-7和基质金属蛋白酶-9的检测:诊断准确性评估
BMC Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 30;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-30.
8
[The value of CA19-9 and CEA in predicting resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinoma].[CA19-9和癌胚抗原在预测肝门部胆管癌可切除性中的价值]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014 Sep;45(5):819-22.
9
Can preoperative and postoperative CA19-9 levels predict survival and early recurrence in patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma?术前和术后CA19-9水平能否预测可切除肝门部胆管癌患者的生存及早期复发情况?
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):45335-45344. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17336.
10
Intraductal ultrasonography combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy for the preoperative evaluation of longitudinal tumor extent in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.经皮经肝胆管镜检查联合胆管内超声检查对肝门部胆管癌纵向肿瘤范围的术前评估。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;25(2):286-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05944.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Bile Duct Lithiasis Mimicking a Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-An Endless Dilemma: A Case Report.酷似肝门部胆管癌的胆管结石——一个无尽的难题:病例报告
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 3;12(15):5104. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155104.
2
Comparing the efficacy and complications of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage (EBD) and Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.比较内镜下胆管引流术(EBD)和经皮经肝胆管引流术(PTBD)在肝门部胆管癌患者中的疗效及并发症。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Dec;11(12):7720-7724. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_922_22. Epub 2023 Jan 17.