Suppr超能文献

法医成像:使用猪模型在模拟虐待儿童案件中检测骨骼创伤时各种成像方式的敏感性。

Forensic imaging: The sensitivities of various imaging modalities in detecting skeletal trauma in simulated cases of child abuse using a pig model.

作者信息

Spies Amy Joy, Steyn Maryna, Bussy Elrentia, Brits Desiré

机构信息

Human Variation and Identification Research Unit (HVIRU), School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.

Department of Radiology, Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, 21 Eton Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.

出版信息

J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Nov;76:102034. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102034. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

Abstract

Physical child abuse is a major problem in South Africa and throughout the world, and the detection of skeletal trauma in victims of abuse may be critical in the accurate investigation of these cases. Since many of these fractures are not detected during traditional autopsy, the use of various diagnostic imaging tools is implemented in order to aid in the detection of trauma. In South Africa, Lodox (low-dose full-body X-ray) is commonly used in forensic mortuaries and the aim of this study was to assess the sensitivities of CT, X-ray and Lodox, in comparison to dry bone as the gold standard, in detecting both the number of fractures and minimum number of impacts in piglets subjected to blunt force trauma. Ten piglets were beaten with a mallet post-mortem in every region of the body. CT, X-ray and Lodox scans were taken of each piglet, after which the piglets were macerated in order to conduct an osteological analysis of the remains. The number of fractures and impacts present in each scan and on the dry bone were recorded. CT scans were the most sensitive in identifying trauma in all regions of the body, detecting 73% of fractures and 79% of impacts. X-ray and Lodox scans were less sensitive in detecting both fractures (50% and 42% respectively) and impacts (59% and 54% respectively). An assessment of the directionality of trauma was possible using dry bone and CT scans, but not when using X-rays or Lodox scans. CT scans can be used to assess skeletal trauma in suspected victims of child abuse, but the use of X-ray and Lodox scans is not recommended other than for initial screening procedures. Osteological analysis, however, is still considered the gold standard and should be performed whenever possible.

摘要

儿童身体虐待在南非乃至全世界都是一个重大问题,而在虐待受害者中检测骨骼创伤对于准确调查此类案件可能至关重要。由于许多此类骨折在传统尸检过程中未被发现,因此会使用各种诊断成像工具来协助检测创伤。在南非,法医停尸房通常使用Lodox(低剂量全身X射线),本研究的目的是将CT、X射线和Lodox的敏感性与作为金标准的干骨进行比较,以检测遭受钝器创伤的仔猪的骨折数量和最小撞击次数。十只仔猪在死后身体的每个部位都用木槌击打。对每只仔猪进行CT、X射线和Lodox扫描,之后将仔猪浸软以便对残骸进行骨学分析。记录每次扫描以及干骨上的骨折和撞击数量。CT扫描在识别身体所有部位的创伤方面最为敏感,能检测到73%的骨折和79%的撞击。X射线和Lodox扫描在检测骨折(分别为50%和42%)和撞击(分别为59%和54%)方面敏感性较低。使用干骨和CT扫描可以评估创伤的方向性,但使用X射线或Lodox扫描时则无法做到。CT扫描可用于评估疑似受虐儿童受害者的骨骼创伤,但除初始筛查程序外,不建议使用X射线和Lodox扫描。然而,骨学分析仍被视为金标准,应尽可能进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验