Altman F M
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland 04102.
Semin Respir Infect. 1987 Mar;2(1):74-81.
Thirty-five years ago pneumonia prophylaxis failed because the agents available then did not have the antibacterial spectrum necessary to prevent colonization and infection with multiple gram-negative bacteria. Combinations of the newer antibiotics delivered intratracheally do cover most common organisms and they may be sufficient for prophylaxis. Careful monitoring is necessary because a number of unusual pathogens have the potential to circumvent the prophylactic regimen. Widespread use of topical antibiotics may result in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in intensive care unit areas. The magnitude of this risk is difficult to calculate and some maneuvers are available to decrease the likelihood that this will occur. Nevertheless, at present these uncertainties are sufficient to prevent the routine clinical use of antibiotics for pneumonia prophylaxis. There are now eight studies showing that prophylaxis can decrease the incidence of pneumonia by greater than 50%. These should stimulate further clinical research designed to minimize the problems with bacterial resistance.
35年前,肺炎预防失败,因为当时可用的药物没有预防多种革兰氏阴性菌定植和感染所需的抗菌谱。经气管内给药的新型抗生素联合使用确实能覆盖大多数常见病原体,可能足以用于预防。必须进行仔细监测,因为一些不常见的病原体有可能规避预防方案。局部使用抗生素的广泛应用可能会导致重症监护病房出现抗菌药物耐药性。这种风险的程度难以计算,并且有一些措施可用于降低其发生的可能性。然而,目前这些不确定性足以阻止抗生素在肺炎预防中的常规临床应用。现在有八项研究表明,预防可使肺炎发病率降低50%以上。这些研究应刺激进一步的临床研究,以尽量减少细菌耐药性问题。