Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology and Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Neurology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;92(3):255-262. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323952. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
Brain death, or death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC), has been accepted conceptually, medically and legally for decades. Nevertheless, some areas remain controversial or understudied, pointing to a need for focused research to advance the field. Multiple recent contributions have increased our understanding of BD/DNC, solidified our practice and provided guidance where previously lacking. There have also been important developments on a global scale, including in low-to-middle income countries such as in South America. Although variability in protocols and practice still exists, new efforts are underway to reduce inconsistencies and better train practitioners in accurate and sound BD/DNC determination. Various legal challenges have required formal responses from national societies, and the American Academy of Neurology has filled this void with much needed guidance. Questions remain regarding concepts such as 'whole brain' versus 'brainstem' death, and the intersection of BD/DNC and rubrics of medical futility. These concepts are the subject of this review.
脑死亡或神经标准判定的死亡(BD/DNC)几十年来在概念上、医学上和法律上都已被接受。然而,一些领域仍然存在争议或研究不足,这表明需要进行重点研究来推动该领域的发展。最近的多项研究增进了我们对 BD/DNC 的理解,巩固了我们的实践,并在以前缺乏指导的地方提供了指导。在全球范围内也取得了重要进展,包括在南美洲等中低收入国家。尽管协议和实践仍然存在差异,但正在努力减少不一致性,并更好地培训从业人员进行准确和合理的 BD/DNC 判定。各种法律挑战都需要国家学会做出正式回应,美国神经病学学会则提供了急需的指导。关于“全脑”与“脑干”死亡等概念以及 BD/DNC 和医疗无效性分类的交叉问题仍然存在疑问。这些概念是本次综述的主题。