• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

零自杀实施效果试验研究方案,在使用 A-I-M 自杀预防模式的门诊行为健康中。

Zero suicide implementation-effectiveness trial study protocol in outpatient behavioral health using the A-I-M suicide prevention model.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jan;100:106224. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106224. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2020.106224
PMID:33220488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7887031/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of suicidal patients often suffers owing to a lack of integrated care and standardized approaches for identifying and reducing risk. The National Strategy for Suicide Prevention endorsed the Zero Suicide (ZS) model, a multi-component, system-wide approach to identify, engage, and treat suicidal patients. The ZS model is a framework for suicide prevention in healthcare systems with the aspirational goal of eliminating suicide in healthcare. While the approach is widely endorsed, it has yet to be evaluated in a systematic manner. This trial evaluates two ZS implementation strategies statewide in specialty mental health clinics.

METHODS/STUDY DESIGN: This trial is the first large-scale implementation of the ZS model in mental health clinics using the Assess, Intervene, and Monitor for Suicide Prevention (A-I-M) clinical model. Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 design, we are testing the effectiveness of ZS implementation in 186 mental health clinics in 95 agencies in New York State. Agencies are randomly assigned to either: "Basic Implementation" (BI; a large group didactic learning collaboratives) or "Enhanced Implementation" (EI; participatory small group learning collaboratives; enhanced consultation for site champions). Primary outcomes include suicidal behaviors, hospitalizations and Emergency Department visits; implementation outcomes include protocol adoption, protocol fidelity and barriers/facilitators to implementation.

DISCUSSION

This project has the potential to have a significant public health impact by determining the effectiveness of the ZS model in mental health clinics, a setting where suicide attempts and suicides occur at a higher rate than any other healthcare setting. It will also provide guidance on the implementation level required to achieve uptake and sustainability of ZS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

N/A.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏综合护理和标准化方法来识别和降低风险,自杀患者的治疗往往受到影响。《国家预防自杀战略》支持“零自杀(ZS)”模式,这是一种多组件、全系统的方法,用于识别、参与和治疗自杀患者。ZS 模式是医疗保健系统预防自杀的框架,其理想目标是消除医疗保健中的自杀。虽然这种方法得到了广泛的认可,但它尚未得到系统的评估。本试验在全州的专业心理健康诊所评估两种 ZS 实施策略。

方法/研究设计:本试验是首次在心理健康诊所使用评估、干预和监测预防自杀(A-I-M)临床模型大规模实施 ZS 模型。采用混合有效性-实施类型 1 设计,我们正在测试 ZS 在纽约州 95 个机构的 186 家心理健康诊所中的实施效果。机构被随机分配到以下两种方案之一:“基本实施(BI;大型小组讲座式学习合作)”或“强化实施(EI;参与式小组学习合作;为现场负责人提供强化咨询)”。主要结局包括自杀行为、住院和急诊就诊;实施结局包括方案采用、方案忠实度以及实施的障碍/促进因素。

讨论

本项目有可能通过确定 ZS 模型在心理健康诊所中的有效性产生重大的公共卫生影响,因为自杀企图和自杀发生的频率比任何其他医疗保健环境都高。它还将为实现 ZS 的采用和可持续性所需的实施水平提供指导。

试验注册

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/fc08dcee6374/nihms-1649404-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/b48fdbd64ed9/nihms-1649404-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/efd3693d801f/nihms-1649404-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/fc08dcee6374/nihms-1649404-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/b48fdbd64ed9/nihms-1649404-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/efd3693d801f/nihms-1649404-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43ec/7887031/fc08dcee6374/nihms-1649404-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Zero suicide implementation-effectiveness trial study protocol in outpatient behavioral health using the A-I-M suicide prevention model.零自杀实施效果试验研究方案,在使用 A-I-M 自杀预防模式的门诊行为健康中。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jan;100:106224. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106224. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
The Relationship Between Suicidal Behaviors and Zero Suicide Organizational Best Practices in Outpatient Mental Health Clinics.自杀行为与门诊心理健康诊所零自杀组织最佳实践之间的关系。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Oct 1;72(10):1118-1125. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000525. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
"Zero Suicide" - A model for reducing suicide in United States behavioral healthcare.“零自杀”——美国行为健康护理领域减少自杀的一种模式。
Suicidologi. 2018;23(1):22-30.
4
A suicide prevention strategy for youth presenting to the emergency department with suicide related behaviour: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对因自杀相关行为就诊于急诊科的青年的自杀预防策略:一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2422-y.
5
A regional systems intervention for suicide prevention in the Netherlands (SUPREMOCOL): study protocol with a stepped wedge trial design.荷兰预防自杀的区域系统干预 (SUPREMOCOL):采用逐步楔形试验设计的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2342-x.
6
Effectiveness of a targeted brief intervention for recent suicide attempt survivors: a randomised controlled trial protocol.针对近期自杀未遂幸存者的目标性简短干预的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e070105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070105.
7
Safety planning intervention and follow-up: A telehealth service model for suicidal individuals in emergency department settings: Study design and protocol.安全规划干预与随访:急诊科自杀患者的远程医疗服务模式:研究设计与方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 May;140:107492. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107492. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Determining feasibility of incorporating consumer engagement into implementation activities: study protocol of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type II pilot.确定将消费者参与纳入实施活动的可行性:一项混合有效性-实施型 II 期试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):e050107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050107.
9
Suicide Screening, Risk Assessment, and Lethal Means Counseling During Zero Suicide Implementation.在实施零自杀计划期间进行自杀筛查、风险评估和致命方法咨询。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Jul 1;75(7):638-645. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230211. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
10
Adapting the Zero Suicide framework to the adult emergency department setting: Strategies for nurse leaders.将“零自杀”框架应用于成人急诊环境:护士领导者的策略。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2024 Aug;51:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Automated Safety Plan Scoring in Outpatient Mental Health Settings.探索大语言模型在门诊心理健康环境中进行自动安全计划评分的潜力。
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 27:2025.03.26.25324610. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.26.25324610.
2
Zero Suicide Model Implementation and Suicide Attempt Rates in Outpatient Mental Health Care.门诊心理健康护理中的零自杀模式实施与自杀未遂率
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253721. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3721.
3
Suicide Screening, Risk Assessment, and Lethal Means Counseling During Zero Suicide Implementation.

本文引用的文献

1
The Need for Innovation in Health Care Systems to Improve Suicide Prevention.医疗体系创新以改善自杀预防的必要性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 1;77(1):96-98. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2769.
2
"Zero Suicide" - A model for reducing suicide in United States behavioral healthcare.“零自杀”——美国行为健康护理领域减少自杀的一种模式。
Suicidologi. 2018;23(1):22-30.
3
The Zero Suicide Model: Applying Evidence-Based Suicide Prevention Practices to Clinical Care.零自杀模式:将基于证据的自杀预防实践应用于临床护理。
在实施零自杀计划期间进行自杀筛查、风险评估和致命方法咨询。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Jul 1;75(7):638-645. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230211. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
A Statewide Evaluation of the Implementation of Evidence-Based Suicide Prevention Guidelines in Juvenile Detention Centers.少年拘留中心循证自杀预防指南实施情况的全州评估。
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Jul 1;75(7):678-688. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220490. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
5
Prototyping the implementation of a suicide prevention protocol in primary care settings using PDSA cycles: a mixed method study.使用计划-实施-检查-行动(PDSA)循环在基层医疗环境中对自杀预防协议的实施进行原型设计:一项混合方法研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 25;15:1286078. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1286078. eCollection 2024.
6
Suicide Risk Assessment, Management, and Mitigation in the Emergency Setting.急诊环境中的自杀风险评估、管理与缓解
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2023 Jan;21(1):8-17. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20220072. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
7
Learning Collaboratives: a Strategy for Quality Improvement and Implementation in Behavioral Health.学习协作组织:行为健康领域的质量改进和实施策略。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;50(2):263-278. doi: 10.1007/s11414-022-09826-z. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
A cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation trial of an intervention to increase the adoption of PAX Good Behaviour Game, a mental health prevention program, in Australian primary schools: Study protocol.一项集群随机有效性-实施试验,该试验旨在干预澳大利亚小学增加采用心理健康预防项目“PAX良好行为游戏”:研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 May 25;28:100923. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100923. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 23;9:33. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00033. eCollection 2018.
4
Mental Health Service Use Among Adults With Suicide Ideation, Plans, or Attempts: Results From a National Survey.有自杀意念、计划或企图的成年人的心理健康服务使用情况:一项全国性调查的结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1296-302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400593. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验中样本量确定的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv113. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
6
Rationale and study protocol for a two-part intervention: Safety planning and structured follow-up among veterans at risk for suicide and discharged from the emergency department.两部分干预措施的原理与研究方案:针对有自杀风险且从急诊科出院的退伍军人的安全规划与结构化随访
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
A literature review of learning collaboratives in mental health care: used but untested.精神卫生保健领域学习协作的文献综述:已被应用但未经检验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Sep 1;65(9):1088-99. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300229.
8
Health care contacts in the year before suicide death.自杀死亡前一年的医疗接触情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):870-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2767-3. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.动态可持续性框架:应对持续变化中的维持悖论。
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 2;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
10
Understanding the components of quality improvement collaboratives: a systematic literature review.理解质量改进协作的组成部分:系统文献回顾。
Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):354-94. doi: 10.1111/milq.12016.