Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL.
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):675-686. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.390. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
To develop item banks of social attitude barriers and facilitators to participation and validate them with established instruments.
We used the Rasch model to identify misfitting items and rating scale problems, calibrate items, and develop KeyForms and short forms. Correlations between the Social Attitude Barriers and Facilitators item banks with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Social Health domain and National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotional Battery Social Relationships domain were computed to evaluate convergent and divergent validity.
Community-dwelling individuals traveled to 3 academic medical centers for testing.
Participants (N=558) who had a primary impairment of stroke, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury (mean age, 47.0±16.0y) completed 31 social attitude facilitator and 51 barrier items using a 5-point rating scale.
Not applicable.
Item banks to measure social attitude barriers and facilitators for individuals with disabilities.
After combining the "never" and "rarely" rating scale categories, 30 Facilitator items fit the Rasch model and demonstrated person reliability of 0.93. After collapsing the "never" and "rarely" rating scale categories, 45 Barrier items fit the Rasch model and demonstrated person reliability of 0.95. Ceiling and floor effects were negligible for both item banks. Facilitators and Barriers item banks were negatively correlated, and these banks were moderately correlated with PROMIS and Toolbox measures, providing evidence of convergent and divergent validity.
Findings support the reliability and validity of the Social Attitude Facilitators and Barriers item banks. These item banks allow investigators and clinicians to measure perceptions of social attitudes, providing information that can guide individual interventions to reduce barriers and promote facilitators. Moderate correlations between the Social Attitude banks and PROMIS and Toolbox variables provide support for the measurement and theory of environmental influences on social health and participation.
开发参与社会态度障碍和促进因素的项目库,并使用已建立的工具对其进行验证。
我们使用 Rasch 模型来识别不合适的项目和评分量表问题,校准项目,并开发 KeyForms 和短表单。计算社会态度障碍和促进因素项目库与患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)社会健康领域和国家卫生研究院工具包情感电池社会关系领域之间的相关性,以评估收敛和发散效度。
居住在社区的个体前往 3 个学术医疗中心进行测试。
有中风、脊髓损伤或创伤性脑损伤主要损伤的参与者(平均年龄,47.0±16.0y)使用 5 分评分量表完成了 31 项社会态度促进因素和 51 项障碍项目。
不适用。
用于测量残疾个体社会态度障碍和促进因素的项目库。
将“从不”和“很少”评分量表类别合并后,30 个促进因素项目符合 Rasch 模型,个体可靠性为 0.93。将“从不”和“很少”评分量表类别合并后,45 个障碍项目符合 Rasch 模型,个体可靠性为 0.95。两个项目库的天花板和地板效应都可以忽略不计。促进因素和障碍项目库呈负相关,与 PROMIS 和工具包测量值中度相关,提供了收敛和发散效度的证据。
研究结果支持社会态度促进因素和障碍项目库的可靠性和有效性。这些项目库使研究人员和临床医生能够测量社会态度的认知,提供可指导减少障碍和促进促进因素的个体干预的信息。社会态度银行与 PROMIS 和工具包变量之间的中等相关性为社会健康和参与的环境影响的测量和理论提供了支持。