San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2021769. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21769.
Biased patient behavior negatively impacts resident well-being. Data on the prevalence and frequency of these encounters are lacking and are needed to guide the creation of institutional trainings and policies to support trainees.
To evaluate the frequency of resident experiences with and responses to a range of biased patient behaviors.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective survey was sent via email to 331 second- and third-year internal medicine residents from 3 academic medical centers in California and North Carolina. First-year residents were excluded owing to their limited interactions with patients at the time of participant recruitment. Data were collected from August 21 to November 25, 2019.
Descriptive statistics were used to report the frequency of experience of various types of biased patient behavior, residents' responses, the factors impeding residents' responses, and residents' experiences and beliefs regarding training and policies.
Overall, 232 of 331 residents (70%) participated; 116 (50%) were women; 116 of 247 (47%) were White (participants had the option of selecting >1 race/ethnicity); and 23 (10%) identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. The frequency of resident-reported experience of types of biased patient behaviors varied. The most common behaviors-belittling comments and assumption of nonphysician status-were reported to be experienced 1 or more times per week by 14% of residents (32 of 231) and 17% of residents (38 of 230), respectively. Women, Black or Latinx, and Asian residents reported experiencing biased behavior more frequently. Forty-five percent of Black or Latinx residents (17 of 38) encountered instances of explicit epithets or rejection of care. All 70 Asian residents reported experiencing inquiries into their ethnic origins. Most women residents (110 of 115 [96%]) experienced role questioning behaviors, and 87% (100 of 115) experienced sexual harassment. The need to prioritize clinical care and a sense of futility in responding were the most common factors (cited by 34% of residents [76 of 227] and 25% of residents [56 of 227], respectively) significantly impeding responses to biased behaviors. Eighty-five percent of residents (191 of 226) never reported incidents to their institution. Eighty-nine percent of residents (206 of 232) identified training and policies as necessary or very necessary.
This survey study suggests that biased patient behavior is experienced frequently by internal medicine residents. Non-White and women residents reported experiencing a disproportionate burden of these incidents. Residents' responses rarely included institutional involvement. Residency programs and health care systems should prioritize training and policies to address biased patient behavior and support affected residents.
有偏见的患者行为会对住院医师的幸福感产生负面影响。缺乏关于这些遭遇的发生率和频率的数据,这些数据对于指导机构培训和政策的制定以支持住院医师非常重要。
评估住院医师经历和应对一系列有偏见的患者行为的频率。
设计、地点和参与者:一项回顾性调查通过电子邮件发送给来自加利福尼亚州和北卡罗来纳州 3 所学术医疗中心的 331 名二、三年级内科住院医师。由于在参与者招募时,一年级住院医师与患者的互动有限,因此将其排除在外。数据收集于 2019 年 8 月 21 日至 11 月 25 日。
使用描述性统计数据报告各种类型的有偏见的患者行为的发生率、住院医师的反应、阻碍住院医师反应的因素以及住院医师对培训和政策的经验和看法。
共有 331 名住院医师中的 232 名(70%)参与了研究;116 名(50%)为女性;247 名中的 116 名(47%)为白人(参与者可以选择多种种族/族裔);23 名(10%)自认为是女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别或酷儿。住院医师报告的有偏见的患者行为发生率存在差异。最常见的行为——轻视的评论和对非医师身份的假设——分别有 14%(32/231)和 17%(38/230)的住院医师报告每周发生 1 次或以上。女性、黑人或拉丁裔以及亚裔住院医师报告的有偏见的行为更为频繁。45%的黑人或拉丁裔居民(38 人中的 17 人)遇到过明确的侮辱性言论或拒绝治疗的情况。所有 70 名亚裔住院医师都报告了询问他们的族裔起源。大多数女性住院医师(115 人中的 110 人,占 96%)经历了角色质疑行为,87%(115 人中的 100 人)经历了性骚扰。优先考虑临床护理和回应的徒劳感是最常见的阻碍回应偏见行为的因素(分别有 34%的住院医师[76 人]和 25%的住院医师[56 人]提到)。85%的住院医师(226 人中的 191 人)从未向其机构报告过事件。89%的住院医师(232 人中的 206 人)认为培训和政策是必要的或非常必要的。
这项调查研究表明,有偏见的患者行为经常发生在内科住院医师身上。非白人及女性住院医师报告的此类事件负担不成比例。住院医师的反应很少包括机构参与。住院医师培训计划和医疗保健系统应优先考虑培训和政策,以解决有偏见的患者行为问题,并为受影响的住院医师提供支持。