Suppr超能文献

收腹动作和支撑对健康个体腹部肌肉厚度及相关主观难度的影响。

Effect of the Abdominal Draw-In Maneuver and Bracing on Abdominal Muscle Thickness and the Associated Subjective Difficulty in Healthy Individuals.

作者信息

Madokoro Sachiko, Yokogawa Masami, Miaki Hiroichi

机构信息

Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 19;8(4):496. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040496.

Abstract

We evaluated the trunk abdominal muscle thickness while performing different exercises to identify the most effective training and to investigate the subjective difficulty associated with exercising. Twenty-eight men (mean age: 21.6 ± 0.9 years) without orthopedic diseases were enrolled. Ultrasonic imaging was used to measure the thickness of the transversus abdominis (TA), internal oblique, and external oblique muscles while at rest and while performing the abdominal draw-in maneuver and abdominal bracing. Measurements were made in the supine and sitting positions, and the subjective difficulty in performing each exercise was examined using a 5-level evaluation scale. The TA and internal oblique muscle thicknesses were significantly greater during the abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) than during bracing or resting, in the supine and sitting positions. The subjective difficulty of abdominal bracing (AB) was graded significantly higher than that of ADIM. Additionally, a correlation between subjective difficulty and muscle thickness was found for the TA and IO. Our results may contribute to the choice of more effective exercises for spinal stability.

摘要

我们评估了在进行不同运动时躯干腹部肌肉的厚度,以确定最有效的训练方法,并研究与运动相关的主观难度。招募了28名无骨科疾病的男性(平均年龄:21.6±0.9岁)。使用超声成像测量腹横肌(TA)、腹内斜肌和腹外斜肌在休息时以及进行收腹动作和腹部支撑时的厚度。在仰卧位和坐位进行测量,并使用5级评估量表检查进行每项运动的主观难度。在仰卧位和坐位时,收腹动作(ADIM)期间TA和腹内斜肌的厚度明显大于支撑或休息时。腹部支撑(AB)的主观难度评分明显高于ADIM。此外,发现TA和腹内斜肌的主观难度与肌肉厚度之间存在相关性。我们的结果可能有助于选择更有效的运动来维持脊柱稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41ca/7712241/445cf56a8b01/healthcare-08-00496-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Deep abdominal muscle thickness measured under sitting conditions during different stability tasks.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):900-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.900. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
Abdominal draw-in maneuver combined with simulated weight bearing increases transversus abdominis and internal oblique thickness.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;33(12):954-958. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1359866. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Changes in deep abdominal muscle thickness during common trunk-strengthening exercises using ultrasound imaging.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;38(10):596-605. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2897.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Low back pain patients' perspectives on long-term adherence to home-based exercise programmes in physiotherapy.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Dec;38:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
4
Innovative exercise device for the abdominal trunk muscles: An early validation study.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172934. eCollection 2017.
6
Effect of abdominal bracing training on strength and power of trunk and lower limb muscles.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Sep;116(9):1703-13. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3424-9. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Barriers to home-based exercise program adherence with chronic low back pain: Patient expectations regarding new technologies.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;59(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Intra-abdominal Pressure and Trunk Muscular Activities during Abdominal Bracing and Hollowing.
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;37(2):134-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559771. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验