Suppr超能文献

混合牙列中两种错[牙合]畸形评价指标的相关性。

Association between 2 indexes for evaluating malocclusion in the mixed dentition.

机构信息

Department of Community Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Orthodontics, Araras Dental School, Fundação Hermínio Ometto, Araras, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Jan;159(1):81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to associate 2 indexes for evaluating malocclusion in the mixed dentition.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted involving 743 children aged 8-10 years, divided into early and late mixed dentition. The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and criteria proposed by Grabowski were used to evaluate malocclusion. Associations between the DAI (outcome variable) and the other independent variables (gender, race, and mixed dentition stage) were analyzed using logistic regression models. Simple logistic regression models were constructed, estimating the crude odds ratios with the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The variables with P < 0.20 in the simple analyses were tested in multiple logistic regression models, estimating adjusted odds ratios with the respective 95% CIs.

RESULTS

We found that 84.01% (185/220) of the diagnoses were coincidental between the Grabowski Index and DAI in patients without malocclusion. In contrast, 59.80% (439/734) of the patients were diagnosed by both indexes (Grabowski and DAI) with malocclusion. Children with malocclusion, diagnosed by the Grabowski Index, were 5.85 (P = 0.0001 and 95% CI: 4.08-8.39) times more likely to show malocclusions when diagnosed by the DAI.

CONCLUSIONS

DAI and the criteria proposed by Grabowski were expressed differently in relation to malocclusion in the mixed dentition. This study suggests the importance of specific criteria for the evaluation of malocclusion at this stage of development.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在关联 2 种评价混合牙列错畸形的指数。

方法

本研究为基于人群的横断面研究,共纳入 743 名 8-10 岁儿童,分为早期和晚期混合牙列。采用牙审美指数(Dental Aesthetic Index,DAI)和 Grabowski 提出的标准评价错畸形。使用逻辑回归模型分析 DAI(因变量)与其他自变量(性别、种族和混合牙列阶段)之间的关系。构建简单逻辑回归模型,估计粗比值比及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)。在简单分析中 P 值<0.20 的变量在多变量逻辑回归模型中进行检验,估计调整后的比值比及其相应的 95%CI。

结果

我们发现,在无错畸形患者中,Grabowski 指数和 DAI 之间的诊断一致性为 84.01%(185/220)。相比之下,在有错畸形的患者中,80.32%(439/546)两种指数(Grabowski 指数和 DAI)均诊断为错畸形。经 Grabowski 指数诊断为错畸形的儿童,经 DAI 诊断为错畸形的可能性是未经 DAI 诊断为错畸形的儿童的 5.85 倍(P=0.0001,95%CI:4.08-8.39)。

结论

DAI 和 Grabowski 提出的标准在评价混合牙列错畸形方面表现不同。本研究提示在该发育阶段,评价错畸形需要特定的标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验