Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Int J Urol. 2021 Feb;28(2):196-201. doi: 10.1111/iju.14429. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
To compare suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.
A retrospective case-control study comparing three surgeons' experience with 122 suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and 107 standard laparoscopic nephrectomy was carried out. Operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, intraoperative conversion, postoperative bowel recovery, postoperative analgesics, postoperative visual analog pain scale score, postoperative length of stay, days before going back to work, postoperative complications and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire were compared after propensity score matching.
A total of 97 matched pairs were obtained after propensity score matching. There were no statistically significant differences between the suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and standard laparoscopic nephrectomy groups with respect to operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, intraoperative conversion, postoperative bowel recovery, length of stay and postoperative complications. Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy group had decreased postoperative analgesics (20.9 vs 23.5, P = 0.04), visual analog pain scale score at 24 h (4.28 vs 5.28, P = 0.000), visual analog pain scale score at discharge (1.01 vs 1.47, P = 0.000), days before going back to work (28.4 vs 31.9, P = 0.000) and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire score (34.0 vs 42.0, P = 0.000), compared with the standard laparoscopic nephrectomy group.
Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and standard laparoscopic nephrectomy are equivalent in terms of the safety and efficacy. However, suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy confers less postoperative pain, fewer days before going back to work and better cosmetic result when compared with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.
比较耻骨上辅助腹腔镜单部位手术与标准腹腔镜肾切除术。
对 3 位外科医生的经验进行回顾性病例对照研究,比较 122 例耻骨上辅助腹腔镜单部位手术肾切除术和 107 例标准腹腔镜肾切除术。比较手术时间、估计失血量、术中并发症、术中转化、术后肠道恢复、术后止痛药、术后视觉模拟疼痛评分、术后住院时间、恢复工作时间、术后并发症和患者疤痕评估问卷。在倾向评分匹配后进行比较。
在倾向评分匹配后共获得 97 对匹配。在手术时间、估计失血量、术中并发症、术中转化、术后肠道恢复、住院时间和术后并发症方面,耻骨上辅助腹腔镜单部位手术肾切除术组与标准腹腔镜肾切除术组无统计学差异。耻骨上辅助腹腔镜单部位手术肾切除术组术后止痛药减少(20.9 比 23.5,P=0.04),24 小时视觉模拟疼痛评分(4.28 比 5.28,P=0.000),出院时视觉模拟疼痛评分(1.01 比 1.47,P=0.000),恢复工作时间(28.4 比 31.9,P=0.000)和患者疤痕评估问卷评分(34.0 比 42.0,P=0.000)。
耻骨上辅助腹腔镜单部位手术肾切除术和标准腹腔镜肾切除术在安全性和疗效方面是等效的。然而,与标准腹腔镜肾切除术相比,耻骨上辅助腹腔镜单部位手术肾切除术术后疼痛较轻,恢复工作时间较短,美容效果较好。