• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于磁共振成像的颈动脉斑块易损性与未来缺血性事件风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Carotid plaque vulnerability on magnetic resonance imaging and risk of future ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA -

Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA -

出版信息

J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Oct;64(5):480-486. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.04959-0.

DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.20.04959-0
PMID:33236863
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can characterize carotid plaque features, including intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), and thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC), that have increased tendency to cause future cerebrovascular ischemic events. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating association of MRI-identified high-risk plaque features, including IPH, LRNC, and TRFC, with risks of subsequent ischemic events of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or amaurosis fugax (AF) over follow-up duration of ≥3 months.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Multiple databases were searched for relevant publications between January 2000 and March 2020. Studies reporting outcomes of future ischemic events of stroke, TIA, or AF for individual MRI-identified high-risk carotid plaque features over follow-up duration of ≥3 months were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing outcomes between MRI-positive and MRI-negative groups.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Fifteen studies including 2350 patients were included. The annual rate of future ischemic events was 11.9% for MRI-positive IPH, 5.4% for LRNC, and 5.7% for TRFC. IPH, LRNC, and TRFC were associated with increased risk of future ischemic events (OR 6.37; 95% CI, 3.96 to 10.24), (OR 4.34; 95% CI, 1.65 to 11.42), and (OR 10.60, 95% CI 3.56 to 31.58), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study findings strengthen the assertion that MRI-positive "high-risk" or "vulnerable" plaque features, including IPH, LRNC, and/or TRFC can predict risks of future ischemic events of stroke, TIA, or AF.

摘要

简介

磁共振成像(MRI)可以对颈动脉斑块特征进行分析,包括斑块内出血(IPH)、富含脂质的坏死核心(LRNC)和薄/破裂的纤维帽(TRFC),这些特征增加了未来发生脑血管缺血性事件的风险。我们对评估 MRI 识别的高危斑块特征(包括 IPH、LRNC 和 TRFC)与中风、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或一过性黑矇(AF)的后续缺血事件风险的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,随访时间≥3 个月。

证据获取

在 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间,我们对多个数据库进行了检索,以寻找与未来缺血事件(中风、TIA 或 AF)相关的研究。纳入了随访时间≥3 个月,对 MRI 识别的高危颈动脉斑块特征与未来缺血事件风险的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析来估计比较 MRI 阳性组和 MRI 阴性组的优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

证据综合

纳入了 15 项研究,共 2350 例患者。MRI 阳性 IPH 的未来缺血事件年发生率为 11.9%,LRNC 为 5.4%,TRFC 为 5.7%。IPH、LRNC 和 TRFC 与未来缺血事件的风险增加相关(OR 6.37;95%CI,3.96 至 10.24)、(OR 4.34;95%CI,1.65 至 11.42)和(OR 10.60,95%CI,3.56 至 31.58)。

结论

本研究结果进一步证实,MRI 阳性的“高危”或“易损”斑块特征,包括 IPH、LRNC 和/或 TRFC 可预测中风、TIA 或 AF 的未来缺血事件风险。

相似文献

1
Carotid plaque vulnerability on magnetic resonance imaging and risk of future ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于磁共振成像的颈动脉斑块易损性与未来缺血性事件风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Oct;64(5):480-486. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.04959-0.
2
Correlation of MRI-detected vulnerable carotid plaques with clinical presentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.MRI 检测到的易损颈动脉斑块与临床表现的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Jun;64(3):263-271. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.19.04820-3. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Risk prediction of cerebrovascular events with carotid plaque magneitc resonance analysis: A meta-analysis.基于颈动脉斑块磁共振分析的脑血管事件风险预测:一项荟萃分析。
J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;46(2):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.当代颈动脉成像:从狭窄程度到斑块易损性
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
Carotid plaque magnetic resonance imaging and recurrent stroke risk: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉斑块磁共振成像与复发性中风风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15410. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015410.
6
MR imaging of vulnerable carotid plaque.易损性颈动脉斑块的磁共振成像
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Aug;10(4):1019-1031. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.03.12.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical carotid plaque MR protocol using a neurovascular coil compared to a surface coil protocol.使用神经血管线圈的临床颈动脉斑块磁共振方案与表面线圈方案的诊断准确性比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;48(5):1264-1272. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25984. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
8
Plaque vulnerability in patients with high- and moderate-grade carotid stenosis - comparison of plaque features on MRI with histopathological findings.颈动脉中重度狭窄患者斑块易损性——MRI 斑块特征与组织病理学发现的比较。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Feb 17;150:w20174. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20174. eCollection 2020 Feb 10.
9
Carotid plaque components and other carotid artery features associated with risk of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉斑块成分及其他颈动脉特征与卒中风险的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Dec;31(12):106857. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106857. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Carotid plaques in transient ischemic attack and stroke patients: one-year follow-up study by magnetic resonance imaging.短暂性脑缺血发作和脑卒中患者的颈动脉斑块:磁共振成像的一年随访研究。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Dec;45(12):803-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ed15ff.

引用本文的文献

1
3D-Arterial analysis software and CEUS in the assessment of severity and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a comparison with CTA and histopathology.3D 动脉分析软件和 CEUS 在评估颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的严重程度和易损性方面:与 CTA 和组织病理学的比较。
Radiol Med. 2022 Nov;127(11):1254-1269. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01551-z. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
2
F-NaF PET/MRI for Detection of Carotid Atheroma in Acute Neurovascular Syndrome.F-NaF PET/MRI 用于急性神经血管综合征中颈动脉粥样硬化的检测。
Radiology. 2022 Oct;305(1):137-148. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212283. Epub 2022 Jun 7.