• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用以参与者为中心的心理教育程序减轻安慰剂反应:一项在重性抑郁和精神病性障碍中进行的随机、单盲、全部安慰剂研究。

Placebo response mitigation with a participant-focused psychoeducational procedure: a randomized, single-blind, all placebo study in major depressive and psychotic disorders.

机构信息

Hassman Research Institute, Marlton, NJ, USA.

Collaborative NeuroScience Research, Garden Grove, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Mar;46(4):844-850. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00911-5. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41386-020-00911-5
PMID:33244149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8026614/
Abstract

The remarkably high and growing placebo response rates in clinical trials for CNS indications, such as depression and schizophrenia, constitute a major challenge for the drug development enterprise. Despite extensive literature on participant expectancies and other potent psychosocial factors that perpetuate placebo response, no empirically validated participant-focused strategies to mitigate this phenomenon have been available. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Placebo-Control Reminder Script (PCRS), a brief interactive procedure that educates participants about factors known to cause placebo response, which was administered prior to the primary outcome assessments to subjects with major depressive or psychotic disorders who had at least moderate depression. Participants were informed they would participate in a 2-week randomized clinical trial with a 50% chance of receiving either an experimental antidepressant medication or placebo. In actuality, all participants received placebo. Participants randomly assigned to receive the PCRS (n = 70) reported significantly smaller reductions (i.e., less placebo response) in depression than those who did not receive the PCRS (n = 67). The magnitude of this effect was medium (Cohen's d = 0.40) and was not significantly impacted by diagnostic status. The number of adverse events (i.e., nocebo effect) was also lower in the PCRS group, particularly in the first week of the study. These findings suggest that briefly educating participants about placebo response factors can help mitigate the large placebo response rates that are increasingly seen in failed CNS drug development programs.

摘要

临床试验中中枢神经系统(CNS)适应证(如抑郁症和精神分裂症)的安慰剂反应率显著升高且不断增长,这对药物开发企业构成了重大挑战。尽管有大量关于参与者期望和其他增强安慰剂反应的强大心理社会因素的文献,但没有经过验证的、以参与者为中心的策略来减轻这种现象。本研究评估了安慰剂对照提醒脚本(PCRS)的疗效,这是一种简短的互动程序,可教育参与者了解导致安慰剂反应的因素,该程序在主要结局评估之前用于有中度以上抑郁的重度抑郁或精神障碍患者。告知参与者他们将参加一项为期 2 周的随机临床试验,有 50%的机会接受实验性抗抑郁药物或安慰剂。实际上,所有参与者都接受了安慰剂。随机分配接受 PCRS 的参与者(n=70)报告的抑郁症状减轻幅度(即,安慰剂反应较小)明显小于未接受 PCRS 的参与者(n=67)。这种效果的幅度中等(Cohen's d=0.40),不受诊断状态的影响。PCRS 组的不良事件(即,反安慰剂效应)也较少,特别是在研究的第一周。这些发现表明,简要教育参与者了解安慰剂反应因素有助于减轻在 CNS 药物开发计划失败中越来越常见的高安慰剂反应率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/582a34c5e9ad/41386_2020_911_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/5a07c6cc7034/41386_2020_911_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/7b52324892a8/41386_2020_911_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/fd8d5fee19b8/41386_2020_911_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/582a34c5e9ad/41386_2020_911_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/5a07c6cc7034/41386_2020_911_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/7b52324892a8/41386_2020_911_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/fd8d5fee19b8/41386_2020_911_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af4d/8026614/582a34c5e9ad/41386_2020_911_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Placebo response mitigation with a participant-focused psychoeducational procedure: a randomized, single-blind, all placebo study in major depressive and psychotic disorders.采用以参与者为中心的心理教育程序减轻安慰剂反应:一项在重性抑郁和精神病性障碍中进行的随机、单盲、全部安慰剂研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Mar;46(4):844-850. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00911-5. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
2
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for adults with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy: Results from 2 phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.赖氨酸安非他命二甲基磺酸盐辅助治疗对重度抑郁症且对抗抑郁单药治疗反应不足的成年人:两项3期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
3
Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies.度洛西汀50毫克/天和100毫克/天治疗重度抑郁症:一项为期8周的III期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组试验及三项研究的事后汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31 Pt 1:1405-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.006.
4
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.阿立哌唑作为重度抑郁症辅助治疗的疗效和安全性:第二项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):156-65. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31816774f9.
5
Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in support of new drug applications.探索性分析美国食品和药物管理局支持新药申请的主要抑郁症试验的疗效数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):464-72. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06191.
6
Aripiprazole augmentation in major depressive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants.阿立哌唑辅助治疗重度抑郁症:一项针对对抗抑郁药反应欠佳患者的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
CNS Spectr. 2009 Apr;14(4):197-206. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900020216.
7
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of the novel triple reuptake inhibitor amitifadine in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.新型三重再摄取抑制剂阿米替林治疗重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Jan;46(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
9
Efficacy of duloxetine on cognition, depression, and pain in elderly patients with major depressive disorder: an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.度洛西汀对老年重度抑郁症患者认知、抑郁和疼痛的疗效:一项为期8周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;164(6):900-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.900.
10
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.重度抑郁症的新型强化治疗策略
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).

引用本文的文献

1
Placebo and nocebo phenomena in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a narrative review on current knowledge and potential future directions.精神分裂症谱系障碍中的安慰剂和反安慰剂现象:关于当前知识及潜在未来方向的叙述性综述
Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 18;55:e199. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725100901.
2
Hype or hope? High placebo response in major depression treatment with ketamine and esketamine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.炒作还是希望?氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮治疗重度抑郁症时的高安慰剂反应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 8;15:1346697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346697. eCollection 2024.
3
Current and Emerging Technologies to Address the Placebo Response Challenge in CNS Clinical Trials: Promise, Pitfalls, and Pathways Forward.

本文引用的文献

1
A Growing Crisis in Schizophrenia Drug Development: Failing Signal Detection at North American and Other Clinical Trial Sites.精神分裂症药物研发中的一场愈演愈烈的危机:北美及其他临床试验地点信号检测失败
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 3;81(2):19com13110. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19com13110.
2
The Trend of Increasing Placebo Response and Decreasing Treatment Effect in Schizophrenia Trials Continues: An Update From the US Food and Drug Administration.抗精神病药临床试验中安慰剂效应增加和疗效降低的趋势仍在持续:美国食品和药物管理局的最新更新。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 3;81(2):19r12960. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19r12960.
3
Success and efficiency of phase 2/3 adjunctive trials for MDD funded by industry: a systematic review.
应对中枢神经系统临床试验中安慰剂反应挑战的现有及新兴技术:前景、陷阱与未来之路
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2024 Mar 1;21(1-3):19-30. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
4
Influence of study characteristics, methodological rigour and publication bias on efficacy of pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials.研究特征、方法学严谨性和发表偏倚对强迫症药物治疗疗效的影响:随机、安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Feb 12;27(1):e300951. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300951.
5
Possible Strategies to Mitigate Placebo or Vehicle Response in Dry Eye Disease Trials: A Narrative Review.减轻干眼疾病试验中安慰剂或赋形剂反应的可能策略:一项叙述性综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):1827-1849. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00720-1. Epub 2023 May 20.
由行业资助的重度抑郁症2/3期辅助试验的成功率和效率:一项系统评价
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;25(9):1967-1974. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0646-3. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
4
Depressive psychopathology in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.首发精神分裂症谱系障碍的抑郁病理:系统综述、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Psychol Med. 2019 Nov;49(15):2463-2474. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002344. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
The nocebo effect as a source of bias in the assessment of treatment effects.作为治疗效果评估中偏倚来源的反安慰剂效应。
F1000Res. 2019 Jan 3;8:5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17611.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Nocebo Responses in Brain Diseases: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.不良反安慰剂效应在脑部疾病中的作用:当前文献的系统性综述。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:443-462. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
The conundrum of depression clinical trials: one size does not fit all.抑郁症临床试验的难题:一刀切并不适用。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Sep;33(5):239-248. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000229.
8
60 years of placebo-controlled antipsychotic drug trials in acute schizophrenia: Meta-regression of predictors of placebo response.60 年来急性精神分裂症的安慰剂对照抗精神病药物试验:安慰剂反应预测因素的元回归分析。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Response Expectancy and the Placebo Effect.反应预期和安慰剂效应。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:81-93. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
10
Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.安慰剂反应的上升是否影响了抗抑郁药物的临床试验结果?来自美国食品药品监督管理局1987 - 2013年的数据。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):181-192. doi: 10.1002/wps.20421.