Harmsen Jan-Frieder, Latella Christopher, Mesquita Ricardo, Fasse Alessandro, Schumann Moritz, Behringer Michael, Taylor Janet, Nosaka Kazunori
Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Feb;121(2):659-672. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04560-w. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
Despite the widespread occurrence of muscle cramps, their underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unknown. To better understand the etiology of muscle cramps, this study investigated acute effects of muscle cramping induced by maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the amplitude of Hoffmann reflexes (H-reflex) and compound muscle action potentials (M-wave).
Healthy men (n = 14) and women (n = 3) participated in two identical sessions separated by 7 days. Calf muscle cramping was induced by performing MVIC of the plantar flexors in a prone position followed by 2.5-s NMES over the plantar flexors with increasing frequency and intensity. H-reflexes and M-waves evoked by tibial nerve stimulation in gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and soleus were recorded at baseline, and after MVIC-induced cramps and the NMES protocol.
Six participants cramped after MVIC, and H-reflex amplitude decreased in GM and soleus in Session 1 (- 33 ± 32%, - 34 ± 33%, p = 0.031) with a similar trend in Session 2 (5 cramped, p = 0.063), whereas the maximum M-wave was unchanged. After NMES, 11 (Session 1) and 9 (Session 2) participants cramped. H-reflex and M-wave recruitment curves shifted to the left in both sessions and muscles after NMES independent of cramping (p ≤ 0.001).
Changes in H-reflexes after a muscle cramp induced by MVIC and NMES were inconsistent. While MVIC-induced muscle cramps reduced H-reflex amplitude, muscle stretch to end cramping was a potential contributing factor. By contrast, NMES may potentiate H-reflexes and obscure cramp-related changes. Thus, the challenge for future studies is to separate the neural consequences of cramping from methodology-based effects.
尽管肌肉痉挛普遍存在,但其潜在的神经生理机制仍不清楚。为了更好地理解肌肉痉挛的病因,本研究调查了最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)和神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)诱发的肌肉痉挛对霍夫曼反射(H反射)和复合肌肉动作电位(M波)幅度的急性影响。
健康男性(n = 14)和女性(n = 3)参加了两个相同的实验,间隔7天。在俯卧位进行足底屈肌的MVIC,然后对足底屈肌进行2.5秒的NMES,频率和强度逐渐增加,从而诱发小腿肌肉痉挛。在基线时、MVIC诱发痉挛后以及NMES方案后,记录由胫神经刺激在内侧腓肠肌(GM)和比目鱼肌中诱发的H反射和M波。
6名参与者在MVIC后出现痉挛,在第1组中GM和比目鱼肌的H反射幅度降低(-33±32%,-34±33%,p = 0.031),第2组有类似趋势(5人痉挛,p = 0.063),而最大M波未改变。NMES后,第1组有11人、第2组有9人出现痉挛。NMES后,无论是否痉挛,两个实验阶段和肌肉中的H反射和M波募集曲线均向左移动(p≤0.001)。
MVIC和NMES诱发的肌肉痉挛后H反射的变化不一致。虽然MVIC诱发的肌肉痉挛降低了H反射幅度,但肌肉伸展至痉挛结束是一个潜在的促成因素。相比之下,NMES可能增强H反射并掩盖与痉挛相关的变化。因此,未来研究面临的挑战是将痉挛的神经后果与基于方法的效应区分开来。