Evaluating the data quality of the Gazepoint GP3 low-cost eye tracker when used independently by study participants.

The portability of low-cost eye trackers makes them attractive for research outside of the laboratory. Such research may require independent eye-tracker use. The present work compared the data quality of the Gazepoint GP3 when used independently by research participants with expert eye-tracking users. Twenty participants completed a training and a testing session 1 week apart. At training visits, participants were taught how to set up and use eye-tracking hardware and software and how to complete two tasks: a calibration task to measure accuracy and precision, as well as a visual search task to assess target fixations. At the testing session, participants set up the Gazepoint eye tracker and completed the two tasks without assistance. Participant accuracy and precision and visual search performance were compared to values obtained from two expert eye-tracking users. Additionally, the eye-tracker sampling rate, which is sensitive to factors such as head motion, was assessed in both participants and the expert users. Participant accuracy and precision closely approximated expert user values. Participant target fixations were detected with a 92.5% sensitivity and 76.8% specificity, closely mirroring expert user sensitivity and specificity. The sampling rate distribution was also similar between the participants and expert user (the means of those distributions were 16.99 ± 3.0 ms and 16.43 ± 2.3 ms, respectively). When used independently, data quality obtained from a low-cost, portable eye-tracking setup closely approximated values obtained from an expert user and was adequate enough to be a feasible option for some studies that require independent use by study participants.