• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实现有意义且以患者为中心的糖尿病咨询是糖尿病专家和糖尿病患者共同的责任:一项来自 1 型糖尿病患者的定性研究。

Achieving a useful and person-centred diabetes consultation is a shared responsibility between diabetologists and people with diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from people with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2021 Jun;38(6):e14382. doi: 10.1111/dme.14382. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14382
PMID:33245572
Abstract

AIMS

To explore perceptions of useful routine consultations with diabetologists from the perspective of adults with type 1 diabetes, including preferences for discussing psychosocial issues.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews in 2018/2019 with 33 people with type 1 diabetes (age 22-75 years, 20 men and 13 women, median diabetes duration 25 years) recruited from two diabetes clinics in the capital region of Denmark. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic text condensation.

RESULTS

Achieving a useful consultation was perceived as a shared responsibility between people with diabetes and diabetologists. Participants' perspectives of what constitutes a useful consultation and expectations for both consultation and diabetologist varied in relation to perceptions of (1) the interaction between the person with diabetes and diabetologist, including being prepared, being honest, experiencing good rapport and preferring a partnership with the diabetologist or 'keeping it clinical' and (2) the diabetologist's approach to diabetes care, including providing up-to-date knowledge and listening and showing understanding.

CONCLUSIONS

Both content and style of diabetes consultations need to be adapted to the individual person with type 1 diabetes. People with diabetes have an important role in expressing their needs and preferences related to both content and style. Diabetologists need to be aware of and attentive to the many individual needs and expectations among people with diabetes, including the desire and need to discuss psychosocial issues. Dialogue tools for preparation and in consultations may enable people with diabetes to voice their needs and expectations and diabetologists to juggle these diversities.

摘要

目的

从 1 型糖尿病患者的角度探讨与糖尿病专家进行常规会诊的看法,包括对讨论心理社会问题的偏好。

方法

我们于 2018/2019 年在丹麦首都地区的两家糖尿病诊所招募了 33 名 1 型糖尿病患者(年龄 22-75 岁,20 名男性,13 名女性,中位糖尿病病程 25 年)进行半结构式访谈。访谈进行了录音、逐字转录,并使用主题文本浓缩进行分析。

结果

实现有用的会诊被视为糖尿病患者和糖尿病专家的共同责任。参与者对有用会诊的看法以及对咨询和糖尿病专家的期望因以下两方面的看法而有所不同:(1)糖尿病患者与糖尿病专家之间的互动,包括准备、诚实、建立良好的关系以及更倾向于与糖尿病专家建立伙伴关系或“保持专业性”;(2)糖尿病专家的糖尿病护理方法,包括提供最新的知识、倾听和表现出理解。

结论

糖尿病咨询的内容和风格都需要适应每位 1 型糖尿病患者。糖尿病患者在表达他们对内容和风格的需求和偏好方面发挥着重要作用。糖尿病专家需要意识到并关注糖尿病患者的许多个体需求和期望,包括讨论心理社会问题的愿望和需求。准备和咨询过程中的对话工具可以使糖尿病患者表达他们的需求和期望,使糖尿病专家能够应对这些多样性。

相似文献

1
Achieving a useful and person-centred diabetes consultation is a shared responsibility between diabetologists and people with diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from people with type 1 diabetes.实现有意义且以患者为中心的糖尿病咨询是糖尿病专家和糖尿病患者共同的责任:一项来自 1 型糖尿病患者的定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2021 Jun;38(6):e14382. doi: 10.1111/dme.14382. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Flexible inclusion of dialogue about psychosocial aspects of life with type 1 diabetes in routine consultations: A study of a questionnaire-based dialogue tool to promote person-centred support.在常规会诊中灵活纳入有关1型糖尿病患者生活心理社会方面的对话:一项基于问卷的对话工具促进以患者为中心支持的研究
Diabet Med. 2022 Aug;39(8):e14881. doi: 10.1111/dme.14881. Epub 2022 May 22.
3
Does a simple web-based intervention facilitate the articulation of patients' unvoiced agenda for a consultation with their diabetologists? A qualitative study.基于网络的简单干预措施是否有助于患者在与糖尿病专家的就诊中表达他们未说出的议程?一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e026588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026588.
4
Nurses' and physicians' experiences with diabetes consultations and the use of dialogue tools in the DiaPROM pilot trial: A qualitative study.护士和医生在 DiaPROM 试点试验中进行糖尿病咨询的经验以及对话工具的使用:一项定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2021 Jun;38(6):e14419. doi: 10.1111/dme.14419. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
A qualitative study of patients' perspectives on collaboration to support self-management in routine rheumatology consultations.一项关于患者对在常规风湿病会诊中支持自我管理的协作观点的定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 15;17:129. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0984-0.
6
Consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with diabetes in primary care: A qualitative study of patient views.初级保健中护士处方者与糖尿病患者之间的咨询:患者观点的定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
7
"Take me seriously and do something!" - a qualitative study exploring patients' perceptions and expectations of an upcoming orthopaedic consultation.“认真对待我并采取行动!”——一项探索患者对即将到来的骨科会诊的认知与期望的定性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 24;18(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1719-6.
8
Parental expectations before and after 12-month experience with video consultations combined with regular outpatient care for children with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study.父母在 12 个月的视频咨询联合常规门诊治疗 1 型糖尿病患儿前后的期望:一项定性研究。
Diabet Med. 2021 Jun;38(6):e14410. doi: 10.1111/dme.14410. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Improving communication and recall of information in paediatric diabetes consultations: a qualitative study of parents' experiences and views.改善儿科糖尿病会诊中的信息沟通与记忆:一项关于家长经历和观点的定性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Jun 10;15:67. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0388-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-healthcare Professional Dialog from the Patient's Perspective: Concept Analysis Based on Literature Review.患者视角下的医患对话:基于文献综述的概念分析
J Patient Exp. 2025 Mar 16;12:23743735251324395. doi: 10.1177/23743735251324395. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing a Quality Improvement Framework to Enhance the Health System User Experience for Individuals Living With Type 1 Diabetes: The Reshape T1D Study.制定质量改进框架以提升1型糖尿病患者的卫生系统用户体验:重塑1型糖尿病研究
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70172. doi: 10.1111/hex.70172.
3
Mixed methods study on the feasibility of implementing periodic continuous glucose monitoring among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting.
在初级保健机构中,对2型糖尿病患者实施定期连续血糖监测可行性的混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29498. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29498. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
4
Implementing the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a Clinical Tool in Routine Diabetes Care: Focus Group Discussions With Patients and Health Care Professionals.将数字糖尿病问卷作为常规糖尿病护理的临床工具加以应用:与患者及医疗保健专业人员的焦点小组讨论
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 May 25;7(2):e34561. doi: 10.2196/34561.
5
Doctor-Patient Relationship in Synchronous/Real-time Video-Consultations and In-Person Visits: An Investigation of the Perceptions of Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.同步/实时视频会诊与面对面就诊中的医患关系:对1型糖尿病青少年及其父母在新冠疫情期间认知的调查
Int J Behav Med. 2022 Oct;29(5):638-647. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-10047-5. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
6
Cross-national comparison of psychosocial well-being and diabetes outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in US, Brazil, and Iran.美国、巴西和伊朗在新冠疫情期间1型糖尿病成年患者心理社会幸福感与糖尿病结局的跨国比较
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021 Jun 11;13(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13098-021-00681-0.