Suppr超能文献

首个全球奥马珠单抗生物类似药与原研产品用于中重度持续性哮喘的随机对照临床研究

Randomized Comparative Clinical Study of First Global Omalizumab Biosimilar with Innovator Product in Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma.

作者信息

Apsangikar Prasad, Ghadge Pravin, Naik Manoj, Nair Santosh

机构信息

Head Medical Affairs, Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra.

Head Clinical Research, Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2020 Dec;68(12):61-65.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF STUDY

Omalizumab the first anti-IgE antibody is proven with several real-world studies and meta-analyses as important adjuvant in severe allergic asthma. This study was undertaken for the first omalizumab biosimilar to establish clinical biosimilarity and interchangeability with originator product.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind comparative study 105 subjects (70 subjects in the study group and 35 subjects in the reference group) were dosed up to week 16 as double blind phase and responders entered open label phase till week 24. All responders at week 16 received study product in open-label phase of the study as per their dosing schedule till week 24. The additional efficacy assessment visit was performed till week 24. Safety follow up visit was performed in responders at week 26. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment was planned in 48 subjects after first dose of omalizumab.

RESULTS

In double blind phase, 4 (5.80%) asthma exacerbations were reported in study arm compared to 1 (2.86%) asthma exacerbation in reference arm with no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The time to first asthma exacerbation was 53 days in study arm compared to 62 days in reference arm. In study and reference arm, the mean change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) was 7.51 and 5.98 at week 4; and 12.30 and 8.94 at week 16 respectively while mean change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%) was 4.20 and 4.06 at week 4 and 6.77 and 7.10 at week 16 respectively (no statistically significant difference, p>0.05). At week 16, 4 (5.80%) subjects in study arm had 50-75% inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose reduction compared to 2 (5.71%) subjects in reference arm. The proportion of subjects with meaningful improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (improvement in overall AQLQ score ≥0.5), mean change in overall Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score and proportion of responders based on Global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) assessment also was similar at 16 weeks. A total of 101 adverse events were reported out of which 63 were reported in the study or biosimilar arm and 38 were reported in the reference or innovator arm. Two serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported, one in each arm. No deaths occurred during this study and the safety observations are consistent with the known safety profile of omalizumab. All the samples analysed in this study were negative for anti-omalizumab antibodies. There was no significant difference in the PK and PD evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity was concluded to show no meaningful clinical difference of the biosimilar omalizumab with the reference product.

摘要

研究目的

奥马珠单抗作为首个抗IgE抗体,已被多项真实世界研究和荟萃分析证明是重度过敏性哮喘的重要辅助药物。本研究旨在对首个奥马珠单抗生物类似药进行评估,以确立其与原研产品的临床生物相似性和可互换性。

材料与方法

在这项随机、双盲对照研究中,105名受试者(研究组70名,参照组35名)在双盲期给药至第16周,应答者进入开放标签期直至第24周。所有在第16周的应答者在研究的开放标签期按照给药方案接受研究产品直至第24周。在第24周前进行额外的疗效评估访视。在第26周对应答者进行安全性随访。在首次给予奥马珠单抗后,计划对48名受试者进行药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)评估。

结果

在双盲期,研究组报告了4例(5.80%)哮喘加重,参照组报告了1例(2.86%)哮喘加重,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。研究组首次哮喘加重的时间为53天,参照组为62天。在研究组和参照组中,第4周时一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1%)相对于基线的平均变化分别为7.51和5.98;第16周时分别为12.30和8.94,而第4周时一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC%)相对于基线的平均变化分别为4.20和4.06,第16周时分别为6.77和7.10(差异无统计学意义,p>0.05)。在第16周时,研究组有4例(5.80%)受试者吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)剂量减少了50-75%,参照组有2例(5.71%)受试者。在第16周时,哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)有显著改善(总体AQLQ评分改善≥0.5)的受试者比例、哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)总体评分的平均变化以及基于治疗效果整体评估(GETE)的应答者比例也相似。共报告了101例不良事件,其中63例报告于研究组或生物类似药组,38例报告于参照组或原研药组。报告了2例严重不良事件(SAE),每组各1例。本研究期间无死亡发生,安全性观察结果与奥马珠单抗已知的安全性特征一致。本研究中分析的所有样本抗奥马珠单抗抗体均为阴性。PK和PD评估无显著差异。

结论

药代动力学、药效学、疗效、安全性和免疫原性评估结果表明,生物类似药奥马珠单抗与参照产品在临床上无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验