Liu Fei, Feng Xiaoreng, Xiao Yang, Xiang Jie, Chen Keyu, Deng Yihang, Lv Jiaxin, Chen Bin
Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yangjiang people's Hospital, Yangjiang, 529535, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 28;21(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03802-4.
Recently, the infra-acetabular screw has been proposed for use in treatment of acetabular fractures as a part of a periacetabular fixation frame. Biomechanical studies have shown that an additional infra-acetabular screw placement can enhance the fixation strength of acetabular fracture internal fixation. Currently, the reported exit point of the infra-acetabular screw has been located at the ischial tuberosity (Screw I). However, our significant experience in placement of the infra-acetabular screw has suggested that when the exit point is located between the ischial tuberosity and the ischial spine (Screw II), the placement of a 3.5 mm infra-acetabular screw may be easier for some patients. We conducted this study in order to determine the anatomical differences between the two different IACs.
The raw datasets were reconstructed into 3D models using the software MIMICS. Then, the models, in the STL format model, were imported into the software Geomagic Studio to delete the inner triangular patches. Additionally, the STL format image processed by Geomagic Studio was imported again into MIMICS. Finally, we used an axial perspective based on 3D models in order to study the anatomical parameters of the two infra-acetabular screw corridors with different exit points. Hence, we placed the largest diameter virtual screw in the two different screw corridors. The data obtained from this study presents the maximum diameter, length, direction, and distances between the entry point and center of IPE.
In 65.31% males and 40.54% females, we found a screw I corridor with a diameter of at least 5 mm, while a screw II corridor was present in 77.55% in males and 62.16% in females. Compared to screw I, the length of screw II is reduced, the angle with the coronal plane is significantly reduced, and the angle with the transverse plane is significantly increased.
For East Asians, changing the exit point of the infra-acetabular screw can increase the scope of infra-acetabular screw use, especially for females.
最近,髋臼下螺钉已被提议作为髋臼周围固定框架的一部分用于治疗髋臼骨折。生物力学研究表明,额外放置髋臼下螺钉可增强髋臼骨折内固定的强度。目前,报道的髋臼下螺钉出口点位于坐骨结节(螺钉I)。然而,我们在髋臼下螺钉置入方面的丰富经验表明,当出口点位于坐骨结节和坐骨棘之间(螺钉II)时,对于一些患者来说,置入3.5毫米的髋臼下螺钉可能更容易。我们进行这项研究是为了确定两种不同髋臼下螺钉通道的解剖学差异。
使用MIMICS软件将原始数据集重建为3D模型。然后,将STL格式模型的模型导入Geomagic Studio软件以删除内部三角形面片。此外,将经Geomagic Studio处理的STL格式图像再次导入MIMICS。最后,我们基于3D模型使用轴向视角来研究具有不同出口点的两条髋臼下螺钉通道的解剖学参数。因此,我们在两条不同的螺钉通道中放置最大直径的虚拟螺钉。本研究获得的数据呈现了最大直径、长度、方向以及入口点与髋臼后柱中心之间的距离。
在65.31%的男性和40.54%的女性中,我们发现直径至少为5毫米的螺钉I通道,而螺钉II通道在男性中占77.55%,在女性中占62.16%。与螺钉I相比,螺钉II的长度缩短,与冠状面的角度显著减小,与横断面的角度显著增大。
对于东亚人,改变髋臼下螺钉的出口点可增加髋臼下螺钉的使用范围,尤其是对于女性。