Formerly Dept. of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Dept. of Psychology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Feb 26;400:113025. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113025. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
Laboratory rodents raised in environmentally-enriched (EE) cages differ behaviourally and cognitively from conventionally-housed (CH) animals. We hypothesised that mice can detect such differences, testing this using differentially-raised female C57BL/6 s as subjects, and differentially-raised female BALB/cs and DBA/2 s as stimuli, in Social Approach Tests. Because more prone to signs of depression, anxiety, stereotypic behaviour (SB) and aggression, we further hypothesised that CH mice would be less sociable and socially attractive than EE mice. A novel familiarisation paradigm pre-exposed subjects to non-cagemate EE and CH stimulus mice before testing in Social Approach Tests. CH subjects proved less sociable than EE subjects: an effect unrelated to general exploration, anxiety or depression-like traits, and driven specifically by reduced interest in CH stimulus mice. Providing further evidence that CH and EE stimulus mice could be distinguished, subjects proved most attracted to mice from housing unlike their own. CH subjects thus preferred EE over CH stimulus mice, while EE subjects tended to prefer CH over EE: patterns that were not mediated by any measured aspect of stimulus mouse behaviour. Differential bodyweight also seemed unimportant, as was scent: soiled CH and EE bedding/nesting did not elicit the same discrimination. Instead, subjects who avoided CH stimulus mice and were attracted to EE stimulus mice were those who received the most agonism in their home cages. Together this provides the first demonstration that mice can distinguish between individuals raised in enriched or conventional cages, and suggests that receiving agonism from cagemates may motivate mice to seek new, less aggressive companions.
实验室饲养的环境丰富(EE)笼养啮齿动物在行为和认知上与传统笼养(CH)动物不同。我们假设,通过使用不同环境下饲养的雌性 C57BL/6 小鼠作为被试,以及不同环境下饲养的雌性 BALB/c 和 DBA/2 小鼠作为刺激物,在社会接近测试中,老鼠可以检测到这种差异。因为更倾向于出现抑郁、焦虑、刻板行为(SB)和攻击行为,我们进一步假设 CH 小鼠比 EE 小鼠的社交性和社交吸引力更低。一个新的熟悉化范式,在社会接近测试前,使被试预先接触非同笼的 EE 和 CH 刺激小鼠。CH 被试的社交性明显低于 EE 被试:这种效应与一般探索、焦虑或类似抑郁的特征无关,而是由对 CH 刺激小鼠的兴趣降低所驱动。这进一步证明了 CH 和 EE 刺激小鼠可以被区分,被试对与自己的饲养环境不同的刺激小鼠最感兴趣。因此,CH 被试更喜欢 EE 刺激小鼠,而 EE 被试则倾向于更喜欢 CH 刺激小鼠:这些模式不受刺激小鼠行为的任何测量方面的影响。体重差异似乎也不重要,因为气味也不重要:脏的 CH 和 EE 垫料/巢不会引起相同的辨别。相反,那些回避 CH 刺激小鼠并被 EE 刺激小鼠吸引的被试,是那些在自己的笼子里受到最多攻击的被试。总的来说,这首次证明了老鼠可以区分在丰富或传统环境中饲养的个体,并且表明从同笼的老鼠那里获得攻击可能会促使老鼠寻找新的、攻击性较低的伴侣。