United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Food Quality Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
School of Animal & Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, 1117 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238711.
In the US Southwest, it is common to observe birds in leafy green fields, though the risk they contribute to foodborne outbreaks remains unclear. In this study, we investigated and recorded the relationship between birds near leafy green fields and the risk for contaminated irrigation water or leafy green plants. We monitored the presence of birds for over two years and performed cloacal swab analysis for non-pathogenic , O157:H7 and , while also monitoring the incidence of other microbial indicators. We also assessed the risks from bird feces by performing observations in a commercial field reported with positive samples and by analyzing the survival of foodborne pathogens in bird feces. Our results showed that most of the birds near the crop fields were resident small birds. We did not observe a correlation between the number of birds in sites and the incidence of indicator bacteria (e.g., coliforms, ) in irrigation canal water, with the exception of one out of four sites where water flow was low or stagnant. Using walk-in-traps, 305 birds were captured and placed in short-term captivity to determine the presence of various bacteria. None of the birds tested positive for O157:H7 or . However, nearly 40% of the birds captured were confirmed positive for non-pathogenic . We found no correlation between age (young, adult, unknown), gender (male, female, unknown) and the incidence of positive birds, but we observed significantly higher probability of incidence during October-December. The role of relative humidity and temperature on bacterial survival appeared to play a key role in the survival of on the leaves of spinach plants in a commercial field. This was also confirmed in laboratory conditions where inoculated in bird feces and exposed to 15 °C and 80% RH(Relative humidity) survived beyond 133 days, while at 26 °C and 40% RH, the organism was undetectable after 63 days. Our results suggest that local birds associated with leafy green fields likely pose a minimal impact of risk for food contamination, but also points out the need for increased analysis specifically for O157:H7. Furthermore, our study suggests the need for expanding research that addresses risks associated with large migratory birds, especially in areas where stagnated water sources would be used for overhead sprinkle irrigation.
在美国西南部,观察绿叶田野中的鸟类是很常见的,但它们对食源性疾病爆发的贡献仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们调查并记录了绿叶田野附近鸟类与受污染灌溉水或绿叶植物之间的关系。我们对鸟类进行了两年多的监测,并进行了非致病性、O157:H7 和 的直肠拭子分析,同时还监测了其他微生物指标的发生率。我们还通过对一个报告有阳性样本的商业领域进行观察,并通过分析食源性病原体在鸟类粪便中的存活情况,评估了鸟类粪便带来的风险。我们的结果表明,农田附近的大多数鸟类都是留鸟小型鸟类。我们没有观察到田间鸟类数量与灌溉渠水中指示性细菌(如大肠菌群、)的发生率之间存在相关性,除了四个站点中的一个站点,那里的水流缓慢或停滞。使用步入式陷阱,捕获了 305 只鸟类,并将其短期囚禁,以确定各种细菌的存在。没有鸟类对 O157:H7 或 呈阳性。然而,近 40%的捕获鸟类对非致病性 呈阳性。我们没有发现年龄(幼鸟、成年、未知)、性别(雄性、雌性、未知)与阳性鸟类发生率之间的相关性,但我们观察到 10 月至 12 月期间发生率显著更高。相对湿度和温度对细菌存活的作用似乎在商业田菠菜叶片上 存活中起着关键作用。在实验室条件下,将接种在鸟类粪便中并暴露在 15°C 和 80%相对湿度(RH)下的细菌存活时间超过 133 天,而在 26°C 和 40%RH 下,63 天后该生物体无法检测到。我们的结果表明,与绿叶田野相关的当地鸟类可能对食物污染的风险影响很小,但也指出需要增加对 O157:H7 的专门分析。此外,我们的研究表明需要扩大研究范围,以解决与大型候鸟相关的风险,特别是在使用停滞水源进行头顶喷洒灌溉的地区。