SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Charles River Laboratories, Laval, Canada.
Int J Radiat Biol. 2021;97(2):126-130. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1844335. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Harmonized animal models are an indispensable tool for the development of safe and effective medical countermeasures (MCMs) against radiation injury, and rhesus macaques (referred herein as NHPs) play a critical role in FDA approval of radiation medical countermeasures for acute and delayed radiation syndromes. Reliance on such models requires that they be well characterized, which consists, in part, of a reproducible dose to mortality response relationship (DRR). However, data describing the DRR for both male and female NHPs from the same study are scarce. Furthermore, the level of supportive care and the use of blood transfusions may shift the DRR, yet such information can be difficult to compare across publications. To address these knowledge gaps, the DRRs of two different NHP total body irradiation (TBI) models are compared in this paper, one which is reliant on the use of male animals provided blood transfusions, and the other which incorporates both sexes wherein animals are not provided transfusions.
Studies were conducted using NHPs ( receiving TBI, with survival reported over a 60 days. Two primary studies, incorporating both male and female animals not receiving blood transfusions as a provision of supportive care, were compared to two previously published studies, which incorporated only male animals provided blood transfusions as a part of the supportive care regimen. Criterion for euthanasia, and all other provisions of supportive care were comparable. Linear probit plots estimating the lethal dose (LD) and upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for 10, 30, 50, 70 and 90% mortality, were compared between individual studies and the two models presented.
Comparison of probit estimates reveals two important findings. (1) Females have higher mortality than males at identical radiation doses, and (2) blood transfusions increased survival of male animals at lower doses but not at high doses of radiation exposure.
The use of single sex animal models may lead to an incomplete understanding of potential sex differences in the dose to mortality response of the TBI model. Consistent use of both sexes and type of supportive care will improve the transferability and reliability of NHP-TBI models currently in use, assist in the selection of radiation doses for single dose lethality studies, and allow investigators to determine the effectiveness of a particular MCM.
协调一致的动物模型是开发针对辐射损伤的安全有效的医疗对策(MCM)的不可或缺的工具,恒河猴(在此称为 NHP)在 FDA 批准针对急性和迟发性辐射综合征的辐射医疗对策方面发挥着关键作用。对这些模型的依赖要求它们具有良好的特征,这部分包括可重现的剂量死亡率反应关系(DRR)。然而,来自同一研究的雄性和雌性 NHP 的 DRR 数据却很少。此外,支持性护理的水平和输血的使用可能会改变 DRR,但此类信息在出版物之间可能难以比较。为了解决这些知识空白,本文比较了两种不同的 NHP 全身照射(TBI)模型的 DRR,一种模型依赖于提供输血的雄性动物,另一种模型则纳入了两性动物,而这些动物没有接受输血。
本研究使用 NHP(接受 TBI,并报告了 60 天的存活情况。比较了两项纳入两性动物且不提供输血作为支持性护理的主要研究,以及两项先前发表的仅纳入提供输血作为支持性护理方案一部分的雄性动物的研究。安乐死的标准以及所有其他支持性护理的规定都是可比的。线性概率图估计了致死剂量(LD)和 10%、30%、50%、70%和 90%死亡率的 95%置信区间(CI)的上限和下限,并在个体研究之间以及提出的两种模型之间进行了比较。
概率估计的比较揭示了两个重要发现。(1)在相同的辐射剂量下,雌性的死亡率高于雄性,(2)输血增加了雄性动物在较低剂量下的存活率,但在高剂量辐射暴露下则没有。
使用单一性别的动物模型可能会导致对 TBI 模型的剂量死亡率反应中潜在性别差异的理解不完整。一致使用两性动物和支持性护理类型将提高当前使用的 NHP-TBI 模型的可转移性和可靠性,有助于选择单次致死剂量研究的辐射剂量,并使研究人员能够确定特定 MCM 的有效性。