Clinical adjustability of radiological tools in patients with surgically resected cT1N0-staged non-small-cell lung cancer from the long-term survival evaluation.

BACKGROUND

Various radiological tools have been introduced to determine the malignancy or prognosis of lung carcinomas. We retrospectively summarized the clinical outcomes to evaluate whether radiological tools such as consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR), tumor disappearance ratio (TDR), and mediastinal diameter (MD) are suitable for surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 260 patients (128 men and 132 women; median age, 64 years) with cT1N0-staged NSCLC who underwent thoracotomy. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

When the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with reference to cT1a/1 mi were calculated, significant differences were observed in cT1b and cT1c for DFS (P=0.04 and P<0.01, respectively) and in cT1c for OS (P=0.01). For HRs with reference to CTR (≤0.5), a significant difference was only observed in CTR (>0.5) for DFS (P=0.01). For HRs with reference to TDR (≤25%), significant differences were observed in TDR (>75%) for DFS (P=0.02) and OS (P=0.02). For HRs with reference to MD (≤5 mm), significant differences were observed in 6-20 mm (P=0.04) and >20 mm (P=0.02) for DFS and in >20 mm (P=0.02) for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

All radiological tools revealed significant correlations with prognosis in the patients with cT1N0-staged NSCLCs. We recommend the use of MD in a clinical context. However, further investigation of this issue is needed.