Zhang Fen, Liang Yi, Chen Xinxin, Xu Liangjie, Zhou Cuicui, Fan Tingpan, Yan Jinchaun
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e22683. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022683.
To evaluate the left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients with diastolic heart failure by echocardiography and explore the clinical value of echocardiography.From July 2017 to January 2018, 120 patients were prospectively selected from the affiliated hospital of Jiangsu university diagnosed as diastolic heart failure (York Heart Association class ≥II, LVEF ≥50%). The patients were divided into group with LVEDP ≤15 mm hg (1 mm hg = 0.133 kpa) (43 cases) and the group with LVEDP >15 mm hg (77 cases) according to the real-time measurement of LVEDP. Receiver operator characteristic curves of each parameter of echocardiography in diagnosis of LVEDP were compared between the 2 groups.Common ultrasonic parameters such as left ventricular inflow tract blood flow propagation velocity, mitral valve diastole e peak velocity/mitral valve diastole a peak velocity, e peak deceleration time, a peak duration, and early diastole interventricular septum bicuspid annulus velocity e' (e'sep) were used to evaluate LVEDP elevation with low accuracy (AUC is only between 0.5 and 0.7). Other ultrasonic parameters such as left atrial volume index (LAVI), tricuspid regurgitation maximum flow rate (TRmax), early diastole left ventricular sidewall bicuspid annulus velocity e' (e'lat), average e', E/e'sep, E/e'lat, average E/e' were used to evaluate LVEDP elevation with a certain improvement in accuracy (AUC between 0.7 and 0.9). Propagation velocity, mitral valve diastole e peak velocity/mitral valve diastole a peak velocity, e peak deceleration time, a peak duration, e'sep, average e', E/e'sep have very low correlation with LVEDP (r = -0.283 to 0.281); LAVI, TRmax, e'lat, E/e'lat, average E/e' and LVEDP are not highly correlated (r = 0.330-0.478). Through real-time left ventricular manometry, multiple regression analysis showed that TRmax, average e', e'lat, LAVI were independently correlated with the actual measured LVEDP.Echocardiography can recognize the increase of LVEDP in patients with heart failure preserved by LVEF, and estimate the value of LVEDP roughly, which can reflect LVEDP to a certain extent, with high feasibility and accuracy.
通过超声心动图评估舒张性心力衰竭患者的左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP),并探讨超声心动图的临床价值。2017年7月至2018年1月,前瞻性选取江苏大学附属医院确诊为舒张性心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会分级≥II级,左心室射血分数≥50%)的120例患者。根据LVEDP的实时测量结果,将患者分为LVEDP≤15 mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)组(43例)和LVEDP>15 mmHg组(77例)。比较两组超声心动图各参数诊断LVEDP的受试者工作特征曲线。使用左心室流入道血流传播速度、二尖瓣舒张期e峰速度/二尖瓣舒张期a峰速度、e峰减速时间、a峰持续时间以及舒张早期室间隔二尖瓣环速度e'(e'sep)等常见超声参数评估LVEDP升高的准确性较低(曲线下面积仅在0.5至0.7之间)。使用左心房容积指数(LAVI)、三尖瓣反流最大流速(TRmax)、舒张早期左心室侧壁二尖瓣环速度e'(e'lat)、平均e'、E/e'sep、E/e'lat、平均E/e'等其他超声参数评估LVEDP升高的准确性有一定提高(曲线下面积在0.7至0.9之间)。传播速度、二尖瓣舒张期e峰速度/二尖瓣舒张期a峰速度、e峰减速时间、a峰持续时间、e'sep、平均e'、E/e'sep与LVEDP的相关性非常低(r = -0.283至0.281);LAVI、TRmax、e'lat、E/e'lat、平均E/e'与LVEDP的相关性不高(r = 0.330 - 0.478)。通过实时左心室测压,多元回归分析显示TRmax、平均e'、e'lat、LAVI与实际测量的LVEDP独立相关。超声心动图能够识别左心室射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者LVEDP的升高,并大致估算LVEDP的值,在一定程度上可反映LVEDP,具有较高的可行性和准确性。