• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青藏高原西部及其周边地区γ值的空间变化及其与断块的关系

Spatial Variation of -Values and Their Relationship with the Fault Blocks in the Western Part of the Tibetan Plateau and Its Surrounding Areas.

作者信息

Hussain Hamid, Shuangxi Zhang, Usman Muhammad, Abid Muhammad

机构信息

Department of Geophysics, School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.

Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 11;22(9):1016. doi: 10.3390/e22091016.

DOI:10.3390/e22091016
PMID:33286785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7597109/
Abstract

The Tibetan Plateau is considered to be one of the best natural laboratories for seismological research. This study sought to determine the spatial variations of -values in the western part of the Tibetan Plateau, along with its surrounding areas, and the relation with the region's fault blocks. The study region lies within 27-36.5° N, 78-89° E, and its fracture structure consists of strike-slip faults, as well as normal and thrust faults. A catalog record from 2009-2019 provided 4431 well-centered earthquakes that varied in magnitude from 0.1 to 8.2 M. The record was obtained from China's seismological network, which is capable of recording low magnitudes to analyze -values in the study area. The key findings of this study are as follows: (1) the range of earthquake depth in the region was 0-256 km, with the depth histogram showing a high frequency occurrence of shallow earthquakes in the area; (2) a time histogram showed that the major earthquakes occurred between 2014-2015, including the notable 2015 Gorkha earthquake (M = 8.2); (3) the -value computed in the study area was 0.5 to 1.6, but in most of the study area, the -value ranged from 0.6 to 0.9, which was a low to intermediate value, due to the presence of strike-slip faults in the central part of the study area and underthrusting in the region (south of the study area); and (4) a high -value was found in the northwestern and eastern regions of the area, which proved that the area is prone to small earthquakes in the near future. The study also showed that the central and southern areas of the study region had low to intermediate -values, meaning that it is prone to destructive and massive earthquakes with high magnitudes, such as the Gorkha earthquake (southern part of the study area). Low -values revealed the degree of variation in rock properties, including large stress and strain, a fractured medium, a high deformation rate, and large faults. Small -values were observed when the stress level was high in the investigated region, which might be used to predict a massive high-magnitude earthquake in the near future.

摘要

青藏高原被认为是地震学研究的最佳天然实验室之一。本研究旨在确定青藏高原西部及其周边地区的 值空间变化,以及与该地区断层块的关系。研究区域位于北纬27 - 36.5°,东经78 - 89°,其断裂构造由走滑断层以及正断层和逆冲断层组成。2009 - 2019年的目录记录提供了4431次震中定位良好的地震,震级从0.1到8.2 M不等。该记录来自中国地震台网,该台网能够记录低震级地震以分析研究区域的 值。本研究的主要发现如下:(1) 该区域地震深度范围为0 - 256 km,深度直方图显示该区域浅源地震发生率较高;(2) 时间直方图显示,主要地震发生在2014 - 2015年之间,包括著名的2015年戈尔卡地震(震级M = 8.2);(3) 研究区域计算出的 值为0.5至1.6,但在研究区域的大部分地区, 值范围为0.6至0.9,这是一个低到中等的值,这是由于研究区域中部存在走滑断层以及该区域(研究区域南部)的俯冲作用;(4) 在该区域的西北部和东部地区发现了高 值,这证明该区域在不久的将来容易发生小地震。研究还表明,研究区域的中部和南部地区 值为低到中等,这意味着它容易发生具有高震级的破坏性大地震,如戈尔卡地震(研究区域南部)。低值揭示了岩石性质的变化程度,包括大应力和应变、破碎介质、高变形率和大断层。当研究区域应力水平较高时观察到小 值,这可能用于预测不久的将来发生的大规模高震级地震。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/742e86816919/entropy-22-01016-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/73e6cd85a798/entropy-22-01016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/937ba6a39071/entropy-22-01016-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/c74653d383a1/entropy-22-01016-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/afa9682c5ff5/entropy-22-01016-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/ab4122436dd2/entropy-22-01016-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/2281acae17b1/entropy-22-01016-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/6f4fde7e8728/entropy-22-01016-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/b1fefb5faaa2/entropy-22-01016-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/89a4d252077d/entropy-22-01016-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/742e86816919/entropy-22-01016-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/73e6cd85a798/entropy-22-01016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/937ba6a39071/entropy-22-01016-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/c74653d383a1/entropy-22-01016-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/afa9682c5ff5/entropy-22-01016-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/ab4122436dd2/entropy-22-01016-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/2281acae17b1/entropy-22-01016-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/6f4fde7e8728/entropy-22-01016-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/b1fefb5faaa2/entropy-22-01016-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/89a4d252077d/entropy-22-01016-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db9/7597109/742e86816919/entropy-22-01016-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Spatial Variation of -Values and Their Relationship with the Fault Blocks in the Western Part of the Tibetan Plateau and Its Surrounding Areas.青藏高原西部及其周边地区γ值的空间变化及其与断块的关系
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 11;22(9):1016. doi: 10.3390/e22091016.
2
Spatial Heterogeneity of b Values in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau and Its Interpretation.青藏高原东北部b值的空间异质性及其解释
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;26(3):182. doi: 10.3390/e26030182.
3
Potential for a large earthquake near Los Angeles inferred from the 2014 La Habra earthquake.从2014年拉哈布拉地震推断洛杉矶附近发生大地震的可能性。
Earth Space Sci. 2015 Sep;2(9):378-385. doi: 10.1002/2015EA000113. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
4
Stress changes from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and increased hazard in the Sichuan basin.2008年汶川地震造成的应力变化以及四川盆地日益增加的灾害风险。
Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):509-10. doi: 10.1038/nature07177. Epub 2008 Jul 6.
5
Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes.不同应力状态下地震规模分布的变化。
Nature. 2005 Sep 22;437(7058):539-42. doi: 10.1038/nature04094.
6
Fault interactions and large complex earthquakes in the Los Angeles area.洛杉矶地区的断层相互作用与大型复杂地震
Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1946-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1090747.
7
Spatial mapping of b-value and fractal dimension prior to November 8, 2022 Doti Earthquake, Nepal.2022 年 11 月 8 日尼泊尔多蒂地震前的 b 值和分形维空间映射。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0289673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289673. eCollection 2023.
8
Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran.2003年伊朗巴姆地震后浅层断裂带扩容恢复情况。
Nature. 2009 Mar 5;458(7234):64-8. doi: 10.1038/nature07817.
9
Tectonic Implication of the 2022 6.9 Earthquake in Menyuan, Qinghai, China: Analysis of Precise Earthquake Locations and InSAR.青海门源 2022 年 6.9 级地震的构造意义:精确定位与 InSAR 分析
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 13;23(4):2128. doi: 10.3390/s23042128.
10
Evaluation of 0 ≤ ≤ 8 earthquake data sets in African - Asian region during 1966-2015.对1966年至2015年期间亚非地区0≤震级≤8级地震数据集的评估。
Data Brief. 2018 Jan 31;17:588-603. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.01.049. eCollection 2018 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving earthquake prediction accuracy in Los Angeles with machine learning.利用机器学习提高洛杉矶地震预测的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 18;14(1):24440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76483-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Variation and Statistical Assessment of the Value off the Pacific Coast of Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan.日本北海道十胜太平洋沿岸价值的时间变化与统计评估
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Mar 5;21(3):249. doi: 10.3390/e21030249.
2
Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes.不同应力状态下地震规模分布的变化。
Nature. 2005 Sep 22;437(7058):539-42. doi: 10.1038/nature04094.