• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟地区青年的生计、收入强化和社会公民改造项目对其生活质量、幸福感、自尊感以及邻里社会环境质量的影响。

The impact of the livelihoods and income fortification and socio-civic transformation project on the quality of life, wellbeing, self-esteem, and quality of neighbourhood social environment among the youth in slum areas of in Kampala, Uganda.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, 2751, Australia.

Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, 2751, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1872. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09868-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09868-y
PMID:33287767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7720587/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various interventions to improve the quality of life (QoL) among slum dwellers across sub Saharan Africa have been implemented. However, the interventions impacts remain less understood. We assessed the impact of the Urban Program on Livelihoods and Income Fortification and Socio-civic Transformation (UPLIFT) project on QoL, psychological wellbeing, self-esteem, and the quality of neighbourhood social environment of young people aged 13-25 years in slum areas of Makindye and Nakawa Divisions in Kampala, Uganda.

METHODS

The study was designed as a mixed method evaluation using repeated cross-sectional survey and grounded theory in both the intervention and comparison communities. The intervention effect was estimated using the difference-in-differences Kernel propensity-score matching technique, with bootstrapping. The "rcs" option was used given that data were from repeated cross-sectional surveys. A thematic analysis was adopted for the qualitative data to triangulate and complement the quantitative data.

RESULTS

The UPLIFT project led to an improvement in QoL, psychological wellbeing, and self-esteem of young people. In terms of QoL, the project led to a six-percentage point increase in quality of living conditions scores (where higher scores reflect better living conditions; lower ones, worse living conditions). However, a negative effect was observed for personal independence whilst the project did not have any impact on social relations. In terms of self-esteem and psychological wellbeing, the project led to a 4.6-point increase in self-esteem scores, a 5.4-point increase in self-acceptance scores, a 5.3- point increase in purpose in life scores, a 5.7 - point increase in personal growth, and a 10.7-point increase in autonomy scores. However, the project had a negative effect on personal independence; and had no impact on environmental mastery and the quality of neighbourhood social environment.

CONCLUSION

Functional community-owned assets accumulation and capacity building initiatives for young people in slum areas improved their psychological wellbeing and quality of life. However, such initiatives do not appear to address social relationships and personal independence of young people in slum areas.

摘要

背景

为改善撒哈拉以南非洲各地贫民窟居民的生活质量(QoL),已实施了各种干预措施。然而,干预措施的影响仍不太清楚。我们评估了城市生计和收入强化与社会-公民转型项目(UPLIFT)对乌干达坎帕拉马金迪耶和纳卡瓦分区贫民窟地区 13-25 岁年轻人的生活质量、心理健康、自尊和邻里社会环境质量的影响。

方法

本研究采用混合方法评估,在干预和对照社区中均使用重复的横断面调查和扎根理论。使用差异中的差异核倾向得分匹配技术(带有引导)来估计干预效果。由于数据来自重复的横断面调查,因此使用了“rcs”选项。采用主题分析对定性数据进行分析,以对定量数据进行三角剖分和补充。

结果

UPLIFT 项目改善了年轻人的生活质量、心理健康和自尊。就生活质量而言,该项目使生活条件质量评分提高了 6 个百分点(得分越高表示生活条件越好,得分越低表示生活条件越差)。然而,个人独立性方面出现了负面影响,而该项目对社会关系没有任何影响。就自尊和心理健康而言,该项目使自尊评分提高了 4.6 分,自我接纳评分提高了 5.4 分,生活目标评分提高了 5.3 分,个人成长评分提高了 5.7 分,自主评分提高了 10.7 分。然而,该项目对个人独立性产生了负面影响,对环境掌控和邻里社会环境质量没有影响。

结论

功能性社区所有资产积累和青年能力建设举措改善了贫民窟地区年轻人的心理健康和生活质量。然而,这些举措似乎并没有解决贫民窟地区年轻人的社会关系和个人独立性问题。

相似文献

1
The impact of the livelihoods and income fortification and socio-civic transformation project on the quality of life, wellbeing, self-esteem, and quality of neighbourhood social environment among the youth in slum areas of in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟地区青年的生计、收入强化和社会公民改造项目对其生活质量、幸福感、自尊感以及邻里社会环境质量的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1872. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09868-y.
2
The Socioeconomic and Sexual Health Status of Young People Living in Urban Slum Areas of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市城区贫民窟青年的社会经济和性健康状况。
J Urban Health. 2019 Aug;96(4):616-631. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00347-3.
3
Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes.涉及物理环境和基础设施干预措施的贫民窟改造策略及其对健康和社会经济成果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD010067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010067.pub2.
4
Do Community-based Livelihood Interventions Affect Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Young People in Slum Areas of Uganda: a Difference-in-difference with Kernel Propensity Score Matching Analysis.基于社区的生计干预是否会影响乌干达贫民窟地区年轻人的性健康和生殖健康及权利:基于核倾向评分匹配分析的差分分析。
J Urban Health. 2022 Feb;99(1):164-189. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00596-1. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
5
Quality of life of older adults in two contrasting neighbourhoods in Accra, Ghana.加纳阿克拉两个对比社区老年人的生活质量。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113659. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113659. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Unintended socio-economic and health consequences of COVID-19 among slum dwellers in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟居民中 COVID-19 的意外社会经济和健康后果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12453-6.
7
Sexual, Reproductive Health Needs, and Rights of Young People in Slum Areas of Kampala, Uganda: A Cross Sectional Study.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟地区年轻人的性健康、生殖健康需求与权利:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169721. eCollection 2017.
8
Health, quality of life, and wellbeing of older slum dwellers in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲贫民窟老年人的健康、生活质量和幸福感:范围综述。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Dec;16(12):1870-1888. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1840610. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
The Ugandan Youth Quality of Life index: assessing the relevance of incorporating perceived importance into the quality of life measure and factors associated with the quality of life among youth in slum areas of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达青年生活质量指数:评估将感知重要性纳入生活质量衡量标准的相关性以及与乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟地区青年生活质量相关的因素。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Jul 15;9:31362. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31362. eCollection 2016.
10
Neighbourhood deprivation and adolescent self-esteem: exploration of the 'socio-economic equalisation in youth' hypothesis in Britain and Canada.邻里剥夺与青少年自尊:对英加两国“青年社会经济均衡化”假说的探索
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.021. Epub 2013 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining men's attitudes toward family planning in Istanbul, Turkey.调查土耳其伊斯坦布尔男性对计划生育的态度。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):1150. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22402-2.
2
Determinants for male involvement in family planning and contraception in Nakawa Division, Kampala, Uganda; An urban slum qualitative study.乌干达坎帕拉纳卡瓦分区男性参与计划生育和避孕的决定因素;一项城市贫民窟定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 31;4(5):e0003207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003207. eCollection 2024.
3
" Challenges to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉抗逆转录病毒疗法依从性面临的挑战
Afr Geogr Rev. 2024;43(1):18-31. doi: 10.1080/19376812.2022.2101496. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
4
Effect of a Multisectoral Agricultural Intervention on HIV Health Outcomes Among Adults in Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.多部门农业干预对肯尼亚成年人艾滋病毒健康结局的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2246158. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46158.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors Associated with HIV, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), and HIV/STI Co-infection Among Youth Living in the Slums of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟青年中与 HIV、性传播感染(STI)和 HIV/STI 合并感染相关的风险因素。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Apr;24(4):1023-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02444-5.
2
The Socioeconomic and Sexual Health Status of Young People Living in Urban Slum Areas of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉市城区贫民窟青年的社会经济和性健康状况。
J Urban Health. 2019 Aug;96(4):616-631. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00347-3.
3
Problem Drinking, Alcohol-Related Violence, and Homelessness among Youth Living in the Slums of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟青年的问题饮酒、与酒精相关的暴力行为和无家可归问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 24;15(6):1061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061061.
4
Non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors and diabetes among adults living in slum areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh.孟加拉国达卡贫民窟地区成年人中的非传染性疾病(NCD)风险因素与糖尿病
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0184967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184967. eCollection 2017.
5
Sexual, Reproductive Health Needs, and Rights of Young People in Slum Areas of Kampala, Uganda: A Cross Sectional Study.乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟地区年轻人的性健康、生殖健康需求与权利:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169721. eCollection 2017.
6
Improving the health and welfare of people who live in slums.改善贫民窟居民的健康和福利。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):559-570. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31848-7. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
7
The Ugandan Youth Quality of Life index: assessing the relevance of incorporating perceived importance into the quality of life measure and factors associated with the quality of life among youth in slum areas of Kampala, Uganda.乌干达青年生活质量指数:评估将感知重要性纳入生活质量衡量标准的相关性以及与乌干达坎帕拉贫民窟地区青年生活质量相关的因素。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Jul 15;9:31362. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31362. eCollection 2016.
8
Can We Increase Psychological Well-Being? The Effects of Interventions on Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.我们能提高心理健康水平吗?干预措施对心理健康的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0158092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158092. eCollection 2016.
9
Educational Attainment and Women's Environmental Mastery in Midlife: Findings From a British Birth Cohort Study.教育程度与中年女性对环境的掌控:一项英国出生队列研究的结果
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2016 Apr;82(4):314-35. doi: 10.1177/0091415016641687. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
10
Evaluating Propensity Score Methods in a Quasi-Experimental Study of the Impact of Menu-Labeling.在一项关于菜单标签影响的准实验研究中评估倾向得分方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144962. eCollection 2015.