• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构入院时协作药物审查服务的提供情况存在差异。

Variation in Provision of Collaborative Medication Reviews on Entry to Long-Term Care Facilities.

机构信息

University of South Australia, UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):148-155.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.027. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.027
PMID:33288466
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are comprehensive medication reviews conducted by clinical pharmacists and general medical practitioners. RMMRs are the primary government-funded service to optimize medication management in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and are recommended for all new residents. This study investigated resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision within 90 days of RACF entry and national intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision.

DESIGN

National retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged ≥65 years who first entered permanent residential aged care in Australia between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, received at least 1 medication in the previous year, and were alive at 90 days post-RACF entry.

METHODS

Resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Crude and risk-adjusted funnel plots were used to examine intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision.

RESULTS

Of the 143,676 residents from 2799 RACFs included, 30,883 (21.5%) received an RMMR within 90 days. Resident characteristics associated with timely provision included dementia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.08), primary language other than English (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), number of unique prescriptions dispensed in the previous year (aOR [per additional 5 prescriptions] 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), need for medication administration assistance (aORs ranged from 1.35 to 1.42, compared with residents self-managing) and facility remoteness (aORs ranged from 0.67 to 0.75 for residents outside major cities). The proportion of new residents receiving a timely RMMR ranged from 0% (n = 303 RACFs) to 100% (n = 4 RACFs). There were 174 RACFs (6.2%) in which ≥50% of new residents received a timely RMMR.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although there was some evidence that RMMRs are targeted to individuals with a greater burden of medication use and those living with dementia, considerable variation in provision exists nationally. This flagship medication review service is generally underutilized among residents of Australian RACFs.

摘要

目的

住宅药物管理审查(RMMR)是临床药师和普通内科医生进行的全面药物审查。RMMR 是优化澳大利亚住宅老年护理设施(RACF)中药物管理的主要政府资助服务,建议为所有新居民提供。本研究调查了与入住 RACF 后 90 天内及时提供 RMMR 相关的居民特征,并调查了全国范围内及时提供 RMMR 的院内差异。

设计

全国回顾性队列研究。

地点和参与者

2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间首次进入澳大利亚永久性住宅老年护理的年龄≥65 岁的个人,在过去一年中至少服用过一种药物,并且在入住 RACF 后 90 天内仍存活。

方法

使用多变量逻辑回归确定与及时提供 RMMR 相关的居民特征。使用未经调整和风险调整的漏斗图检查及时提供 RMMR 的院内差异。

结果

在来自 2799 家 RACF 的 143676 名居民中,有 30883 名(21.5%)在 90 天内接受了 RMMR。与及时提供相关的居民特征包括痴呆症(调整后的优势比[OR] 1.05,95%置信区间[CI] 1.02-1.08)、非英语母语(OR 1.04,95% CI 1.01-1.09)、前一年开具的独特处方数量(OR[每增加 5 个处方] 1.02,95% CI 1.01-1.03)、需要药物管理协助(OR 范围为 1.35-1.42,与自行管理的居民相比)和设施偏远程度(OR 范围为居住在大城市以外的居民为 0.67-0.75)。及时接受 RMMR 的新居民比例从 0%(n=303 家 RACF)到 100%(n=4 家 RACF)不等。有 174 家 RACF(6.2%)的新居民中有≥50%及时接受了 RMMR。

结论和意义

尽管有证据表明 RMMR 主要针对药物使用负担更大和患有痴呆症的个人,但全国范围内的供应情况存在很大差异。澳大利亚 RACF 居民对这种主要药物审查服务的使用率普遍较低。

相似文献

1
Variation in Provision of Collaborative Medication Reviews on Entry to Long-Term Care Facilities.长期护理机构入院时协作药物审查服务的提供情况存在差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):148-155.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.027. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
2
Medicines use before and after comprehensive medicines review among residents of long-term care facilities: a retrospective cohort study.长期护理机构居民综合药物评估前后用药情况:回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 8;22(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03187-0.
3
Provision of a comprehensive medicines review is associated with lower mortality risk for residents of aged care facilities: a retrospective cohort study.提供全面的药物审查与养老院居民的死亡率降低相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jul 1;51(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac149.
4
National Trends and Policy Impacts on Provision of Home Medicines Reviews and Residential Medication Management Reviews in Older Australians, 2009-2019.2009-2019 年澳大利亚老年人家庭用药审查和住院药物管理审查的提供情况及其国家趋势和政策影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 20;18(18):9898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189898.
5
Canaries in the coalmine: Stakeholder perspectives of medication management reviews for residents with dementia.煤矿中的金丝雀:痴呆症患者药物管理审查的利益相关者观点
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Sep;16(9):1220-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
Process Evaluation of the SImplification of Medications Prescribed to Long-tErm Care Residents (SIMPLER) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: A Mixed Methods Study.长期护理居民简化用药(SIMPLER)整群随机对照试验的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115778.
7
Impact of medication reviews on inappropriate prescribing in aged care.药物审查对老年护理中不适当处方的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 May;34(5):833-838. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1424624. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
8
Reducing the Burden of Complex Medication Regimens: SImplification of Medications Prescribed to Long-tErm care Residents (SIMPLER) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.减轻复杂药物治疗方案的负担:长期护理居民处方药物简化(SIMPLER)整群随机对照试验
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Aug;21(8):1114-1120.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Comparison of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults with and without dementia receiving residential medication management reviews.比较患有和不患有痴呆症的老年接受住院药物管理评估的患者的多药治疗和潜在不适当药物使用情况。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Sep;43(3):628-635. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13316. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
10
Emergency department transfers and hospital admissions from residential aged care facilities: a controlled pre-post design study.来自老年护理机构的急诊科转诊和住院情况:一项前后对照设计研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 12;16:102. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0279-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of an electronic medication management application to support Pharmacists Review to Optimise Medicines in Residential Aged Care (PROMPT-RC): a study protocol for a parallel cluster randomised controlled trial.使用电子药物管理应用程序支持药师审查以优化老年护理机构中的药物使用(PROMPT-RC):一项平行整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e097345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097345.
2
The prevalence of and variation in indicators of the quality and safety of long term aged care in Australia, 2019: a cross-sectional population-based study.2019年澳大利亚长期老年护理质量与安全指标的患病率及差异:一项基于人群的横断面研究
Med J Aust. 2025 Aug 18;223(4):189-196. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52709. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
3
Implementing Australia's new guidelines for appropriate psychotropic medication use in residential aged care: Applying the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research.
实施澳大利亚关于在老年护理机构中合理使用精神药物的新指南:应用实施研究综合框架
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Mar;44(1):e70013. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70013.
4
Achieving safe medication management during transitions of care from hospital: time for a stewardship approach.在医院护理转接过程中实现安全用药管理:采用管理方法的时机已到。
Aust Prescr. 2024 Aug;47(4):106-108. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.034.
5
Medication management in long-term care: using evidence generated from real-world data to effect policy change in the Australian setting.长期护理中的药物管理:利用来自真实世界数据的证据推动澳大利亚政策变革。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 2;193(12):1645-1649. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae136.
6
Symptomatic and preventive medication use according to age and frailty in Australian and Japanese nursing homes.根据年龄和虚弱程度在澳大利亚和日本养老院使用症状和预防药物。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Dec;35(12):3047-3057. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02600-x. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Impact of on-site pharmacists in residential aged care facilities on the quality of medicines use: a cluster randomised controlled trial (PiRACF study).养老院内驻场药师对改善老年人药物使用质量的影响:一项整群随机对照试验(PiRACF 研究)
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 25;13(1):15962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42894-5.
8
The role of on-site pharmacist in residential aged care facilities: findings from the PiRACF study.驻场药剂师在老年护理机构中的作用:PiRACF研究结果
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Jul 3;16(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00587-4.
9
Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA): integrating cross-sectoral information to evaluate quality and safety of care provided to older people.澳大利亚老年人登记处(ROSA):整合跨部门信息,以评估为老年人提供的护理的质量和安全性。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 17;12(11):e066390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066390.
10
Provision of a comprehensive medicines review is associated with lower mortality risk for residents of aged care facilities: a retrospective cohort study.提供全面的药物审查与养老院居民的死亡率降低相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jul 1;51(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac149.