Jang Se Young, Tak Won Young, Park Soo Young, Kweon Young-Oh, Lee Yu Rim, Kim Gyeonghwa, Hur Keun, Han Man-Hoon, Lee Won Kee
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Cell and Matrix Research Institute, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Ann Lab Med. 2021 May 1;41(3):302-309. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.3.302.
Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) has been established as a non-invasive biomarker for liver fibrosis. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of M2BPGi compared with those of other liver fibrosis markers in liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
We analyzed serum M2BPGi levels in 113 NAFLD patients. A pathologist graded liver fibrosis histopathologically. The diagnostic efficacies of serum M2BPGi and other liver fibrosis markers (aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index based on four factors, and NAFLD fibrosis score [NFS]) were evaluated using correlation, area under the ROC curve (AUC), logistic regression, and C-statistics.
Serum M2BPGi level and other liver fibrosis markers showed a moderate correlation with fibrosis grade. The AUC values of M2BPGi were 0.761, 0.819, 0.866, and 0.900 for diagnosing fibrosis (F)>0, F>1, F>2, and F>3, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed M2BPGi as the only independent factor associated with F>2 and F>3. Although C-statistics showed that NFS was the best diagnostic factor for F>2 and F>3, M2BPGi with NFS had an increased C-statistics value, indicating that it is a better diagnostic model.
The serum M2BPGi level increased with liver fibrosis severity and could be a good biomarker for diagnosing advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in NAFLD patients. A well-controlled, prospective study with a larger sample size is needed to validate the diagnostic power of M2BPGi and other fibrosis markers in NAFLD.
Mac-2结合蛋白糖基化异构体(M2BPGi)已被确立为肝纤维化的一种非侵入性生物标志物。我们评估了M2BPGi与其他肝纤维化标志物相比在非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)肝纤维化中的诊断效能。
我们分析了113例NAFLD患者的血清M2BPGi水平。病理学家对肝纤维化进行组织病理学分级。使用相关性、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、逻辑回归和C统计量评估血清M2BPGi和其他肝纤维化标志物(天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数、基于四个因素的纤维化指数以及NAFLD纤维化评分[NFS])的诊断效能。
血清M2BPGi水平和其他肝纤维化标志物与纤维化分级呈中度相关。M2BPGi诊断纤维化(F)>0、F>1、F>2和F>3的AUC值分别为0.761、0.819、0.866和0.900。逻辑回归分析显示M2BPGi是与F>2和F>3相关的唯一独立因素。尽管C统计量表明NFS是F>2和F>3的最佳诊断因素,但M2BPGi与NFS联合使用时C统计量值增加,表明它是一个更好的诊断模型。
血清M2BPGi水平随肝纤维化严重程度增加,可能是诊断NAFLD患者晚期纤维化和肝硬化的良好生物标志物。需要进行一项样本量更大、严格控制的前瞻性研究来验证M2BPGi和其他纤维化标志物在NAFLD中的诊断能力。