Suppr超能文献

维持期肾移植患者从贝拉西普转换为另一种免疫抑制方案

Conversion From Belatacept to Another Immunosuppressive Regimen in Maintenance Kidney-Transplantation Patients.

作者信息

Gouin Anna, Sberro-Soussan Rebecca, Courivaud Cécile, Bertrand Dominique, Del Bello Arnaud, Darres Amandine, Ducloux Didier, Legendre Christophe, Kamar Nassim

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.

Service de néphrologie-Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, AP-HP, Paris et Université Paris Descartes, Paris.

出版信息

Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Oct 6;5(12):2195-2201. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.09.036. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic, several physicians have questioned pursuing belatacept in kidney-transplant patients in order to reduce the risk of nosocomial transmission during the monthly infusion. The effect of the conversion from belatacept to another immunosuppressive regimen is underreported. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the effect on kidney function and the clinical outcome of the conversion from belatacept to another regimen.

METHODS

We have identified 44 maintenance kidney transplantation patients from five French kidney transplantation centers who were converted from belatacept to another regimen either because of a complication (n = 28) or another reason (patients' request or belatacept shortage, n = 13). The follow-up after the conversion from belatacept was 27.5 ± 25.3 months.

RESULTS

Overall, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased from 44.2 ± 16 ml/min per 1.73 m at conversion from belatacept to 35.7 ± 18.4 ml/min per 1.73 m at last follow-up ( = 0.0002). eGFR significantly decreased in patients who had been given belatacept at transplantation as well as in those who had been converted to belatacept earlier. The decrease was less significant in patients who had stopped belatacept without having experienced any complications. Finally, eGFR decreased more severely in patients who were converted to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), compared to those who received mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi). Few patients also developed diabetes and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, transplantation physicians should avoid stopping belatacept when not clinically required.

摘要

引言

在2019年冠状病毒病(Covid-19)大流行期间,一些医生对肾移植患者使用贝拉西普提出质疑,目的是降低每月输注期间医院内传播的风险。从贝拉西普转换为另一种免疫抑制方案的效果报道较少。本回顾性研究的目的是评估从贝拉西普转换为另一种方案对肾功能和临床结局的影响。

方法

我们从五个法国肾脏移植中心确定了44例维持性肾移植患者,他们因并发症(n = 28)或其他原因(患者要求或贝拉西普短缺,n = 13)从贝拉西普转换为另一种方案。从贝拉西普转换后的随访时间为27.5±25.3个月。

结果

总体而言,平均估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)从转换贝拉西普时的每1.73平方米44.2±16毫升/分钟降至最后一次随访时的每1.73平方米35.7±18.4毫升/分钟(P = 0.0002)。移植时接受贝拉西普治疗的患者以及较早转换为贝拉西普的患者的eGFR显著下降。在未发生任何并发症而停止使用贝拉西普的患者中,下降幅度较小。最后,与接受雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂(mTORi)的患者相比,转换为钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的患者eGFR下降更为严重。少数患者还出现了糖尿病和高血压。

结论

因此,移植医生在无临床需要时应避免停用贝拉西普。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1de2/7710888/164c2b3c75c9/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验