Luján M, Peñuelas Ó, Cinesi Gómez C, García-Salido A, Moreno Hernando J, Romero Berrocal A, Gutiérrez Ibarluzea I, Masa Jiménez J F, Mas A, Carratalá Perales J M, Gaboli M, Concheiro Guisán A, García Fernández J, Escámez J, Parrilla Parrilla J, Farrero Muñoz E, González M, Heili-Frades S B, Sánchez Quiroga M Á, Rialp Cervera G, Hernández G, Sánchez Torres A, Uña R, Ortolà C F, Ferrer Monreal M, Egea Santaolalla C
Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Barcelona; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, España.
Servicio de Medicina Intensiva y Grandes Quemados, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid; Grupo de Trabajo de la SEMICYUC de Insuficiencia Respiratoria Aguda, España.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun-Jul;45(5):298-312. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.08.016. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.
成人、儿童和新生儿急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者的无创呼吸支持(NIRS)包括两种治疗方式,即无创机械通气(NIMV)和高流量鼻导管(HFNC)治疗。然而,不同专业的专家对于这些技术在不同临床环境中的益处存在分歧。本共识的目的是为ARF患者无创支持的应用制定一系列良好临床实践建议,这些建议得到了所有参与成人及儿童/新生儿ARF管理的科学协会的认可。为此,联系了相关的不同协会,这些协会进而指定了一组26名在使用这些技术方面有足够经验的专业人员。基于文献综述以及与无创呼吸支持的3个类别(适应症、监测和随访)相关的最新证据,召开了3次面对面会议以就建议(共计71条)达成一致。最后,各参与科学协会的专家通过远程方式对每条建议进行投票。为了对一致程度进行分类,选择了一种易于使用且直观的类似物分类系统,该系统明确说明了每种无创呼吸支持干预措施是应采用、可采用还是不应采用。