Talreja Deepa, Gupta Chirag, Pai Hrishikesh, Palshetkar Nandita, Shah Rupin
Bloom IVF Center, Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Urology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Jul-Sep;13(3):201-208. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_41_19. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
Azoospermia is a highly evolving subject in the last few decades. In the past, use of donor sperm was the only option providing a realistic chance of conception for couples affected by azoospermia. Introduction of sperm retrieval techniques and assisted reproductive technologies, especially intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has provided these men a chance to father their genetically own child and changed the management approach significantly.
The objective was to compare the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and ICSI outcomes of surgically retrieved sperms in cases of obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) as well as to evaluate the efficacy of sperm retrieval techniques.
A total of sixty azoospermic patients were included in the study. The patients were divided between OA (16) and NOA groups (44). A retrospective outcome analysis was done on SRR and ICSI results among them.
The overall SRR in patients with NOA and OA was 47.7% and 100%, respectively ( < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, higher serum follicle-stimulating hormone has shown significantly decreased sperm retrieval. The size of testes was not found to be related to sperm retrieval. Fertilization and embryo formation rate were found to be higher in OA cases in comparison to those of NOA cases. Clinical pregnancy rate showed no significant difference.
Various sperm retrieval techniques can provide new dimensions for successful ICSI and managing azoospermia patients. Although SRRs as well as ICSI outcomes are lower in NOA patients than patients with OA, still they are potentially fertile. A systematic approach especially in patients with NOA is an important step. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction is an attractive option for NOA patients in order to increase the chances of successful sperm retrieval.
在过去几十年里,无精子症是一个快速发展的研究领域。过去,对于受无精子症影响的夫妇来说,使用供体精子是唯一能提供现实受孕机会的选择。精子采集技术和辅助生殖技术的引入,尤其是卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI),为这些男性提供了生育自己基因后代的机会,并显著改变了治疗方法。
比较梗阻性和非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)患者手术采集精子的精子采集率(SRR)和ICSI结果,并评估精子采集技术的疗效。
本研究共纳入60例无精子症患者。患者分为梗阻性无精子症(OA,16例)和非梗阻性无精子症(NOA,44例)两组。对他们的SRR和ICSI结果进行回顾性结果分析。
NOA和OA患者的总体SRR分别为47.7%和100%(<0.001)。亚组分析显示,血清卵泡刺激素水平较高者的精子采集率显著降低。未发现睾丸大小与精子采集有关。与NOA患者相比,OA患者的受精率和胚胎形成率更高。临床妊娠率无显著差异。
各种精子采集技术可为成功的ICSI和治疗无精子症患者提供新的途径。虽然NOA患者的SRR和ICSI结果低于OA患者,但他们仍有潜在的生育能力。尤其是对于NOA患者,采用系统的方法是重要的一步。显微切割睾丸精子提取术是增加NOA患者成功采集精子机会的一种有吸引力的选择。