Suppr超能文献

不同给药方法的右美托咪定用于老年脊髓麻醉患者镇静的效果:一项随机对照研究。

Effects of various methods of dexmedetomidine administration for sedation in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Jeong Jeong, Jin So Hee, Kim Dong Yeon, Cho Sooyoung, Lee Heeseung, Han Jong In

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Jul 31;15(3):297-304. doi: 10.17085/apm.20007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the degree of sedation and the incidence of adverse effects resulting from various methods of administering the initial dose followed by continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for sedation in elderly patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

In total, 72 patients aged over 65 years who were to be administered spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups. The initial doses were injected to the groups as follows: group DD, DEX 0.5 μg/kg for 10 min; group MD, midazolam 0.02 mg/kg; and group D, no initial dose. This was followed immediately by infusing a maintenance dose of DEX 0.5 μg/kg/h to all groups.

RESULTS

The Bispectral index (BIS) in the D group was significantly higher than in the other two groups. There were no significant differences in the Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) among the groups. The RSS 3 level was reached in 10 min from the start of sedation in MD and DD groups and in 20 min from the start of sedation in D group. Neither bradycardia nor hypotension was observed in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in all three groups reached the RSS 3 sedating-effect level. However, the group that received continuous infusion only without the initial dose showed higher BIS than the other two groups and reached the RSS 3 later. No adverse events were observed in any of the groups.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查在接受脊髓麻醉的老年患者中,不同初始剂量给药方法随后持续输注右美托咪定(DEX)进行镇静时的镇静程度及不良反应发生率。

方法

总共72例年龄超过65岁且拟接受脊髓麻醉的患者被随机分为三组。各组分次给予初始剂量如下:DD组,右美托咪定0.5μg/kg,持续10分钟;MD组,咪达唑仑0.02mg/kg;D组,不给予初始剂量。随后立即向所有组输注维持剂量的右美托咪定0.5μg/(kg·h)。

结果

D组的脑电双频指数(BIS)显著高于其他两组。各组间的 Ramsay 镇静评分(RSS)无显著差异。MD组和DD组在镇静开始后10分钟达到RSS 3级,D组在镇静开始后20分钟达到。所有组均未观察到心动过缓或低血压。

结论

所有三组患者均达到了RSS 3级镇静效果水平。然而,仅接受持续输注而无初始剂量的组比其他两组显示出更高的BIS,且达到RSS 3级的时间更晚。所有组均未观察到不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3b7/7713845/9c2566339f6e/apm-20007f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验