UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Ramsey Student Center, University of Georgia, 330 River Rd., Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Sports Med. 2021 Apr;51(4):825-835. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01395-5. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Recent literature has indicated altitude may be a protective factor for concussion but it is unknown whether altitude or heat index affects recovery.
To examine whether on-field heat index and altitude at the time of injury alter acute (< 48 h) concussion assessments, days-to-asymptomatic, and days-to-return-to-play in collegiate athletes following concussion.
Collegiate athletes (n = 187; age = 19.7 ± 1.4 years; male = 70.6%) underwent baseline assessments across 30 universities and experienced a concussion in this retrospective cohort study. Altitude (m) and heat index (°C) at the time and location of injury were determined using valid online database tools. Acute concussion assessments included the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) symptom inventory, Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT). We used multiple linear regression models to determine whether heat index and altitude predicted each acute assessment outcome, days-to-asymptomatic, and days-to-return-to-play.
Collegiate athletes were concussed at a 181.1 m (range - 0.6 to 2201.9 m) median altitude and 17.8 °C (range - 6.1 to 35.6 °C) median heat index. Altitude did not predict (p ≥ 0.265) any outcomes. Every one-degree increase in heat index reduced days-to-asymptomatic (p = 0.047; R = 0.06) and days-to-return-to-play (p = 0.006; R = 0.09) by 0.05 and 0.14 days, respectively. Heat index and altitude did not explain significant variance in SCAT, BESS, and ImPACT composite scores (p's = 0.20-0.922).
Our findings suggest that on-field altitude and heat index at the time of injury do not contribute to clinically meaningful changes on acute assessments or concussion recovery. On-field altitude and heat index do not appear to significantly alter assessment outcomes or clinical recovery, suggesting that environmental factors at altitudes below < 2500 m are negligible outcomes for researchers and clinicians to consider post-concussion.
最近的文献表明,海拔可能是脑震荡的保护因素,但尚不清楚海拔还是热指数会影响恢复。
研究在大学生运动员脑震荡后,受伤时的现场热指数和海拔是否会改变急性(<48 小时)脑震荡评估、无症状天数和重返赛场的天数。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,30 所大学的大学生运动员(n=187;年龄=19.7±1.4 岁;男性=70.6%)接受了基线评估,并经历了脑震荡。使用有效的在线数据库工具确定受伤时和地点的海拔(m)和热指数(°C)。急性脑震荡评估包括运动性脑震荡评估工具(SCAT)症状清单、平衡错误评分系统(BESS)和即时脑震荡后评估和认知测试(ImPACT)。我们使用多元线性回归模型来确定热指数和海拔是否预测了每个急性评估结果、无症状天数和重返赛场的天数。
大学生运动员的脑震荡发生在海拔 181.1m(范围为-0.6 至 2201.9m)的中位数和热指数 17.8°C(范围为-6.1 至 35.6°C)的中位数。海拔没有预测(p≥0.265)任何结果。热指数每升高 1 度,无症状天数(p=0.047;R=0.06)和重返赛场的天数(p=0.006;R=0.09)分别减少 0.05 和 0.14 天。热指数和海拔并没有显著解释 SCAT、BESS 和 ImPACT 综合评分的差异(p 值为 0.20-0.922)。
我们的研究结果表明,受伤时的现场海拔和热指数并不会对急性评估或脑震荡恢复产生有临床意义的影响。现场海拔和热指数似乎并没有显著改变评估结果或临床恢复,这表明在<2500 米的海拔高度以下,环境因素对研究人员和临床医生来说,在脑震荡后并不需要考虑太多。