Suppr超能文献

在 3 期 ALEX 研究中,入组的 ALK 阳性 NSCLC 患者中,通过中心免疫组化或荧光原位杂交确定 ALK 状态的结果。

Outcomes According to ALK Status Determined by Central Immunohistochemistry or Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC Enrolled in the Phase 3 ALEX Study.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We retrospectively examined progression-free survival (PFS) and response by ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) status in patients with advanced ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive NSCLC in the ALEX study.

METHODS

A total of 303 treatment-naive patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. ALK status was assessed centrally using Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx IHC and Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit. Primary end point is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points of interest are objective response rate and duration.

RESULTS

Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (n = 203, 67%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.56; p < 0.0001) and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative tumors (n = 61, 20%) (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78) but not in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors (n = 39, 13%) (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.6-3.2). Objective response rates were higher with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (90.6% versus 81.4%; stratified OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 0.97-5.07) and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative tumors (96.0% versus 75.0%; OR = 9.29, 95% CI: 1.05-81.88) but not in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors (28.6% versus 44.4%; OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.12-1.74). Next-generation sequencing was performed in 35 of 39 patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors; no ALK fusion was identified in 20 of 35 patients (57.1%) by next-generation sequencing, but 10 of 20 (50.0%) had partial response or stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative NSCLC were similar to those of the overall ALEX population. These results suggest that Ventana ALK IHC is a standard testing method for selecting patients for treatment with alectinib.

摘要

介绍

我们回顾性分析了 ALEX 研究中晚期 ALK 免疫组化(IHC)阳性 NSCLC 患者无进展生存期(PFS)和 ALK 荧光原位杂交(FISH)状态的进展情况。

方法

303 例初治患者被随机分为每日两次接受艾乐替尼 600mg 或克唑替尼 250mg 治疗。ALK 状态采用 Ventana ALK(D5F3)CDx IHC 和 Vysis ALK 断裂分离 FISH 探针试剂盒进行中心评估。主要终点为研究者评估的 PFS。次要终点为客观缓解率和缓解持续时间。

结果

与克唑替尼相比,艾乐替尼在 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 阳性肿瘤(n=203,67%)(风险比[HR]0.37,95%置信区间[CI]0.25-0.56;p<0.0001)和 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 无信息肿瘤(n=61,20%)(HR0.39,95%CI0.20-0.78)中显著延长了 PFS,但在 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 阴性肿瘤(n=39,13%)(HR1.33,95%CI0.6-3.2)中未延长。与克唑替尼相比,艾乐替尼在 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 阳性肿瘤(90.6%比 81.4%;分层 OR2.22,95%CI0.97-5.07)和 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 无信息肿瘤(96.0%比 75.0%;OR9.29,95%CI1.05-81.88)中的客观缓解率更高,但在 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 阴性肿瘤(28.6%比 44.4%;OR0.45,95%CI0.12-1.74)中则不然。对 39 例 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 阴性肿瘤患者中的 35 例进行了下一代测序;下一代测序在 35 例患者中的 20 例(57.1%)中未发现 ALK 融合,但在 20 例中有 10 例(50.0%)出现部分缓解或疾病稳定。

结论

ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 阳性和 ALK IHC 阳性且 FISH 无信息 NSCLC 患者的结局与 ALEX 总体人群相似。这些结果表明,Ventana ALK IHC 是选择艾乐替尼治疗患者的标准检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验